Re Medicaments
[2001] 1 WLR 700, the Court of Appeal provided the following exposition of the task of the appellate, or review, court or tribunal:
“ The Court must first ascertain all the circumstances which have a bearing on the suggestion that the Judge was bias. It must then ask whether those circumstances would lead a fair minded and informed observer to conclude that there was a real possibility … that the Tribunal was bias. The material circumstances will include any explanation given by the Judge under review as to his knowledge or appreciation of those circumstances. ”
In
- Permission to Appeal
- Framework of this Appeal
- The Apparent Bias Ground
- BW (Witness statements by advocates)
- Singh v SSHD
- Wagner (advocate’s conduct – fair hearing)
- Alubankudi
- demeanour
- BW (Witness Statements by Advocates) Afghanistan
- Alubankudi (appearance of bias)
- AAN (Veil) Afghanistan
- MM (Unfairness; E&R) Sudan
- Porter v Magill
- Re Medicaments
- Lawal v Northern Spirit
- AM (Fair Hearing) Sudan
- Singh
- as a whole
- a real possibility
- duty
- could
- prima facie
- Decision and Order
