Lawal v Northern Spirit
[2003] UKHL 35, the House of Lords reiterated the importance of first identifying the circumstances which are said to give rise to apparent bias.”
In [8], this Tribunal emphasised that one of the important attributes of the hypothetical reasonable observer is that he is duly informed. What this means is that the reasonable observer is aware of everything bearing on the question of the judge’s impartiality. In short the hypothetical reasonable observer is endowed with greater and fuller attributes than his jurisprudential predecessor, the innocent bystander. 16. I turn to consider another dimension of this appeal. The judicial duty of impartiality, one aspect whereof is the maintenance of an open mind, does not preclude the formation of tentative, provisional views in advance of adjudication. In
- Permission to Appeal
- Framework of this Appeal
- The Apparent Bias Ground
- BW (Witness statements by advocates)
- Singh v SSHD
- Wagner (advocate’s conduct – fair hearing)
- Alubankudi
- demeanour
- BW (Witness Statements by Advocates) Afghanistan
- Alubankudi (appearance of bias)
- AAN (Veil) Afghanistan
- MM (Unfairness; E&R) Sudan
- Porter v Magill
- Re Medicaments
- Lawal v Northern Spirit
- AM (Fair Hearing) Sudan
- Singh
- as a whole
- a real possibility
- duty
- could
- prima facie
- Decision and Order
