The present dispute
The present dispute
Around January 2023, over two years after the completion of the development at Hillside and whilst engaged in redevelopment of Korobe, the objectors wrote to the applicants protesting that they had extended their home in breach of the restrictions. Solicitors were later instructed and legal proceedings were brought against the applicants in the Oxford County Court on 18 August 2023. A trial of a preliminary issue took place on 22 July 2024, at which the applicants argued that the covenants did not apply to their house itself but only to any second building; the Judge found for the objectors. The applicants were granted a stay of those proceedings in order to bring this application, which they made on 15 August 2024
- Heading
- Introduction
- The factual background
- Section 3
- The development at Hillside
- Development at Korobe
- Development at Claremont
- The present dispute
- The legal background
- Does the Tribunal have jurisdiction to modify the restrictions?
- Ground (a): are the covenants obsolete?
- Ground (aa): practical benefits of substantial value or advantage
- The view from Korobe
- Privacy: prevention of overlooking
- The expert valuation evidence
- The sincerity of the objectors’ position
- Control of development at Gap House and Claremont
- Conclusions on ground (aa)
- Ground (c)
- Discretion
- Conclusions
![[2025] UKUT 295 (LC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_lnJS4Uj.png)