UT-2023-000116; - [2025] UKUT 00164 (TCC)
Fecha: 05-Mar-2025
Companies Act, Financial Reporting Standards and RICS Appraisal and Valuation Manual
Companies Act, Financial Reporting Standards and RICS Appraisal and Valuation Manual
The relevant statutory provision which represents the foundation of GAAP is paragraph 9(2), Schedule 4A, Companies Act 1985 (“CA85”), which sets out “the acquisition method of accounting” as requiring that:
“The identifiable assets and liabilities of the undertaking acquired shall be included in the consolidated balance sheet at their fair values at the date of acquisition. In this paragraph the “identifiable” assets or liabilities of the undertaking acquired means the assets or liabilities which are capable of being disposed of or discharged separately, without disposing of a business of the undertaking.”
For the purposes of this decision, the relevant extracts from the Financial Reporting Standards (“FRS”) are recorded in the Decision at FTT [91]-[105] and were not in contention. We set out these paragraphs from the Decision in Appendix 1 to this decision. We should mention that we have not set out FRS15, which played a major role in HMRC’s case before the FTT, but which the FTT considered did not arise and which was not relied upon by either party before us: FTT [216(1)]. We should, however, set out FRS 7.9 which lay at the centre of this appeal and which provided:
“Tangible fixed assets
9 The fair value of a tangible fixed asset should be based on:
(a) market value, if assets similar in type and condition are bought and sold on an open market; or
(b) depreciated replacement cost, reflecting the acquired business’s normal buying process and the sources of supply and prices available to it.
The fair value should not exceed the recoverable amount of the asset.”
In Appendix 2 we set out the FTT’s description (at FTT [116]-[145]) of the relevant Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (“RICS”) Appraisal and Valuation Manual (known as the “Red Book”). Again, the FTT’s description was not in contention.
- Heading
- Table of contents
- Introduction
- Background
- The issues before the FTT – in outline
- The statutory provisions, frs and rics materials
- Stamp Duty Land Tax
- Companies Act, Financial Reporting Standards and RICS Appraisal and Valuation Manual
- The FTT’s Decision
- The Decision - Corporation tax legislation
- The Decision - Corporation Tax and the Accounting context
- The Decision - The Court of Appeal decision in Denning
- The Decision - The FTT’s main conclusions on accounting and valuation
- The Decision - Stamp Duty Land Tax
- The Decision – the FTT’s summary and conclusions
- Ground 1: The FTT erred in considering whether there was an open market in assets similar in type and condition to the identifiable assets
- Ground 1 : the FTT erred when it stated at FTT [220] that GAAP required the valuation of “only the “identifiable asset” in each case, i.e. assuming there to be no current staff, residents, contracts
- Relevant general principles- Grounds 1, 2, 3 and 4(1)
- HMRC v Denning [2022] EWCA Civ 909 (“Denning”)
- Discussion: Grounds 1, 2, 3 and 4(1)
- Nellsar’s appeal - Ground 4 (2)
- Nellsar’s appeal - Ground 5
- HMRC appeal – Grounds 1 and 2
- Disposition
- costs
- MR JUSTICE MELLOR
- The “fair value” concept is explored in detail in FRS 7 “Fair Values in Acquisition Accounting”
- In paragraph 2 of FRS 7, the following relevant definitions are set out
- The following relevant passages appear in the “Statement of Standard Accounting Practice” section (paragraphs 4-31) of FRS 7
- Conclusions