UT-2023-000116; - [2025] UKUT 00164 (TCC)
Fecha: 05-Mar-2025
The Decision - The Court of Appeal decision in Denning
The Decision - The Court of Appeal decision in Denning
Following the hearing of the appeal before the FTT, the Court of Appeal issued its decision in HMRC v Denning [2022] EWCA Civ 909 (“Denning”), which addressed the valuation of leasehold interests of nursing homes for the purposes of SDLT and capital gains tax. The valuations were carried out in accordance with the guidance in VPGA4. The question before the Court of Appeal was:
“Where that valuation method is applied, is the resulting figure the value of the leasehold interest, or the value of both the leasehold interest and “transferrable goodwill”?”
At the request of the FTT, the parties made written submissions on the relevance of Denning to the present appeal: FTT [187].
The Court of Appeal held that a valuation under VPGA4 was a valuation of the property alone, which included a reflection of the trading potential inherent in it. To the extent that this included elements of what had been usually referred to as “goodwill”, it was nonetheless an intrinsic part of the property. Also, the references to “transferrable [sic] goodwill” in GN 1 were to a feature which was “simply part of the inherent qualities of the property itself and its trading potential… There is only one asset, namely the property, and the profits method of valuation is, [as] its description implies, no more than a method of arriving at the value of the property.”
- Heading
- Table of contents
- Introduction
- Background
- The issues before the FTT – in outline
- The statutory provisions, frs and rics materials
- Stamp Duty Land Tax
- Companies Act, Financial Reporting Standards and RICS Appraisal and Valuation Manual
- The FTT’s Decision
- The Decision - Corporation tax legislation
- The Decision - Corporation Tax and the Accounting context
- The Decision - The Court of Appeal decision in Denning
- The Decision - The FTT’s main conclusions on accounting and valuation
- The Decision - Stamp Duty Land Tax
- The Decision – the FTT’s summary and conclusions
- Ground 1: The FTT erred in considering whether there was an open market in assets similar in type and condition to the identifiable assets
- Ground 1 : the FTT erred when it stated at FTT [220] that GAAP required the valuation of “only the “identifiable asset” in each case, i.e. assuming there to be no current staff, residents, contracts
- Relevant general principles- Grounds 1, 2, 3 and 4(1)
- HMRC v Denning [2022] EWCA Civ 909 (“Denning”)
- Discussion: Grounds 1, 2, 3 and 4(1)
- Nellsar’s appeal - Ground 4 (2)
- Nellsar’s appeal - Ground 5
- HMRC appeal – Grounds 1 and 2
- Disposition
- costs
- MR JUSTICE MELLOR
- The “fair value” concept is explored in detail in FRS 7 “Fair Values in Acquisition Accounting”
- In paragraph 2 of FRS 7, the following relevant definitions are set out
- The following relevant passages appear in the “Statement of Standard Accounting Practice” section (paragraphs 4-31) of FRS 7
- Conclusions