UT-2023-000116; - [2025] UKUT 00164 (TCC)
Fecha: 05-Mar-2025
Stamp Duty Land Tax
Stamp Duty Land Tax
The relevant provision in relation to SDLT is paragraph 4 of Schedule 4 to the Finance Act 2003 (“FA03”), which provides as follows:
“Just and reasonable apportionment
(1) For the purposes of this Part consideration attributable—
(a) to two or more land transactions, or
(b) in part to a land transaction and in part to another matter, or
(c) in part to matters making it chargeable consideration and in part to other matters,
shall be apportioned on a just and reasonable basis.
(2) If the consideration is not so apportioned, this Part has effect as if it had been so apportioned.
(3) For the purposes of this paragraph any consideration given for what is in substance one bargain shall be treated as attributable to all the elements of the bargain, even though—
(a) separate consideration is, or purports to be, given for different elements of the bargain, or
(b) there are, or purport to be, separate transactions in respect of different elements of the bargain.”
- Heading
- Table of contents
- Introduction
- Background
- The issues before the FTT – in outline
- The statutory provisions, frs and rics materials
- Stamp Duty Land Tax
- Companies Act, Financial Reporting Standards and RICS Appraisal and Valuation Manual
- The FTT’s Decision
- The Decision - Corporation tax legislation
- The Decision - Corporation Tax and the Accounting context
- The Decision - The Court of Appeal decision in Denning
- The Decision - The FTT’s main conclusions on accounting and valuation
- The Decision - Stamp Duty Land Tax
- The Decision – the FTT’s summary and conclusions
- Ground 1: The FTT erred in considering whether there was an open market in assets similar in type and condition to the identifiable assets
- Ground 1 : the FTT erred when it stated at FTT [220] that GAAP required the valuation of “only the “identifiable asset” in each case, i.e. assuming there to be no current staff, residents, contracts
- Relevant general principles- Grounds 1, 2, 3 and 4(1)
- HMRC v Denning [2022] EWCA Civ 909 (“Denning”)
- Discussion: Grounds 1, 2, 3 and 4(1)
- Nellsar’s appeal - Ground 4 (2)
- Nellsar’s appeal - Ground 5
- HMRC appeal – Grounds 1 and 2
- Disposition
- costs
- MR JUSTICE MELLOR
- The “fair value” concept is explored in detail in FRS 7 “Fair Values in Acquisition Accounting”
- In paragraph 2 of FRS 7, the following relevant definitions are set out
- The following relevant passages appear in the “Statement of Standard Accounting Practice” section (paragraphs 4-31) of FRS 7
- Conclusions