UT-2023-000116; - [2025] UKUT 00164 (TCC)
Fecha: 05-Mar-2025
Table of contents
Table of contents:
Introduction 2
Background 3
The issues before the FTT – in outline 4
The statutory provisions, frs and rics materials 5
Corporation tax 5
Stamp Duty Land Tax 6
Companies Act, Financial Reporting Standards and RICS Appraisal and Valuation Manual 6
The FTT’s Decision 9
The Decision - Corporation tax legislation 9
The Decision - Corporation Tax and the Accounting context: 11
The Decision - The Court of Appeal decision in Denning 13
The Decision - The FTT’s main conclusions on accounting and valuation: 13
The Decision - Stamp Duty Land Tax 15
The Decision – the FTT’s summary and conclusions 15
Nellsar’s grounds of appeal 15
Ground 1: The FTT erred in considering whether there was an open market in assets similar in type and condition to the identifiable assets. 15
Ground 2: The FTT imported a valuation technique which was not prescribed by FRS 7.9. 15
Ground 3: The FTT misconstrued FRS 7.9 by holding that if there was a possible valuation technique available (starting with market value), then FRS 7.9 (b) could not apply. 15
Ground 4: (1) The FTT erred in concluding that Nellsar’s accounts were not compliant with GAAP and (2) in any event the allocation was just and reasonable. 15
Ground 5: The FTT erred by rejecting Nellsar’s apportionment of the consideration paid for the care homes for SDLT purposes as not “just and reasonable”. 15
HMRC’s grounds of appeal 15
Nellsar’s appeal - Grounds 1, 2, 3 and 4(1) 15
Submissions in outline – Grounds 1, 2, 3 and 4(1) 15
Relevant general principles- Grounds 1, 2, 3 and 4(1) 15
HMRC v Denning [2022] EWCA Civ 909 (“Denning”) 15
Discussion: Grounds 1, 2, 3 and 4(1) 15
Nellsar’s appeal - Ground 4 (2) 15
Nellsar’s appeal - Ground 5 15
HMRC’s appeal 15
HMRC appeal – Grounds 1 and 2 15
Disposition 15
costs 15
APPENDIX 1 – FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS MATERIAL: EXTRACTS FROM THE FTT DECISION (using paragraph numbering from the Decision) 15
APPENDIX 2 - RICS MATERIAL – EXTRACTS FROM THE FTT DECISION (using paragraph numbering from the Decision) 15
Appendix 3 - GN1 (2003) Trade-related valuations and goodwill (relevant extracts) 15
- Heading
- Table of contents
- Introduction
- Background
- The issues before the FTT – in outline
- The statutory provisions, frs and rics materials
- Stamp Duty Land Tax
- Companies Act, Financial Reporting Standards and RICS Appraisal and Valuation Manual
- The FTT’s Decision
- The Decision - Corporation tax legislation
- The Decision - Corporation Tax and the Accounting context
- The Decision - The Court of Appeal decision in Denning
- The Decision - The FTT’s main conclusions on accounting and valuation
- The Decision - Stamp Duty Land Tax
- The Decision – the FTT’s summary and conclusions
- Ground 1: The FTT erred in considering whether there was an open market in assets similar in type and condition to the identifiable assets
- Ground 1 : the FTT erred when it stated at FTT [220] that GAAP required the valuation of “only the “identifiable asset” in each case, i.e. assuming there to be no current staff, residents, contracts
- Relevant general principles- Grounds 1, 2, 3 and 4(1)
- HMRC v Denning [2022] EWCA Civ 909 (“Denning”)
- Discussion: Grounds 1, 2, 3 and 4(1)
- Nellsar’s appeal - Ground 4 (2)
- Nellsar’s appeal - Ground 5
- HMRC appeal – Grounds 1 and 2
- Disposition
- costs
- MR JUSTICE MELLOR
- The “fair value” concept is explored in detail in FRS 7 “Fair Values in Acquisition Accounting”
- In paragraph 2 of FRS 7, the following relevant definitions are set out
- The following relevant passages appear in the “Statement of Standard Accounting Practice” section (paragraphs 4-31) of FRS 7
- Conclusions