Discussion and Analysis
Discussion and Analysis
There is no need for us to record the Appellant’s submissions on this ground nor make any determination upon it in light of our conclusion on Ground 2 above. It is not necessary to decide whether there was a procedural error in circumstances where we have been able to consider and decide the substantive issue for ourselves following full argument from both sides.
We should only note this. HMRC’s submissions to the FTT recorded in the Decision are more limited than those made before us on the cross-appeal. Nonetheless, it does not seem to be in dispute that HMRC did not make any oral submissions to the FTT on the issue of waiver, whether on an unconditional or conditional basis.
On the cross-appeal HMRC have submitted that there was no waiver at all, but if there had been, it was only on a conditional basis. They have had permission to argue this ground before us and there could be no objection to them doing so. We have dealt with it above.
We now turn to consider the appeal.
- Heading
- INTRODUCTION
- BACKGROUND – HMRC’S REFUSAL OF EXCISE DUTY DRAWBACK CLAIM
- THE APPEAL AND CROSS APPEAL
- THE CROSS APPEAL
- to provide for the determination of the person on whom any such entitlement is conferred
- The FTT’s powers on appeal against a drawback decision
- The FTT Decision
- HMRC’s submissions
- The FTT’s lack of a general public law jurisdiction
- Specific considerations applicable to s16(5) FA 94
- Discussion and Analysis
- The public law jurisdiction of the FTT
- Ground 2 – Waiver of time limit for drawback claim (see [6] above)
- HMRC’s original and review decisions
- The FTT Decision
- In late 2019, he wrote to HMRC. The letter stated
- The letter was sent under a covering email which stated
- HMRC’s submissions
- Discussion and Analysis
- Ground 1 – Procedural irregularity (see [6] above)
- Discussion and Analysis
- THE APPEAL Ground 1 – Compliance with de-stamping obligations (see [5] above)
- Actions required if goods carry fiscal marks or duty stamps
- Ground 2 – Evidence of export (see [5] above)
- What supporting evidence do I need to submit with my drawback claim form?
- The supporting evidence you need to submit with your drawback claim form
- HMRC’s submissions
- Discussion and analysis
- Discussion and Analysis
- Conclusions
![[2025] UKUT 00315 (TCC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_ICfrj4g.png)