Heading

UT (Tax & Chancery) Case Numbers: UT-2024-000030 & UT-2025-000007
Hearing venue: The Rolls Building
London EC4A 1NL
Heard on: 17-18 June 2025
Supplementary submissions: 9 and 21 July 2025
Judgment date: 23 September 2025
EXCISE DUTY – drawback claim – non compliance with three year time limit following payment of the excise duty provided by Regulation 7(6) of The Excise Goods (Drawback Regulations) 1995 (“EGDR”) - other conditions of public notice Excise Notice 207 (“EN 207”) not being complied with (the requirements to obliterate duty stamps in accordance with Duty Stamp Regulations 2006 and to provide certain documents as proof of export) – exercise of discretion to waive conditions or otherwise allow claim under Regulation 7(1)(a) – extent of the FTT’s jurisdiction to consider reasonableness of HMRC’s decision in appeal pursuant to section 16(5) of the Finance Act 1994 – whether HMRC agreed to waive the time limit for making the claim – whether other conditions satisfied
Before
JUDGE RUPERT JONES
JUDGE KEVIN POOLE
Between
DRINKS AND FOOD UK LIMITED
Appellant / Cross Respondent
and
THE COMMISSIONERS FOR HIS MAJESTY’S REVENUE AND CUSTOMS
Respondents / Cross Appellants
Representation:
For the Appellant: Mr Tristan Thornton tax consultant of TT Tax
For the Respondents: Ms Isabel McArdle of counsel instructed by the General Counsel and Solicitor for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
DECISION
- Heading
- INTRODUCTION
- BACKGROUND – HMRC’S REFUSAL OF EXCISE DUTY DRAWBACK CLAIM
- THE APPEAL AND CROSS APPEAL
- THE CROSS APPEAL
- to provide for the determination of the person on whom any such entitlement is conferred
- The FTT’s powers on appeal against a drawback decision
- The FTT Decision
- HMRC’s submissions
- The FTT’s lack of a general public law jurisdiction
- Specific considerations applicable to s16(5) FA 94
- Discussion and Analysis
- The public law jurisdiction of the FTT
- Ground 2 – Waiver of time limit for drawback claim (see [6] above)
- HMRC’s original and review decisions
- The FTT Decision
- In late 2019, he wrote to HMRC. The letter stated
- The letter was sent under a covering email which stated
- HMRC’s submissions
- Discussion and Analysis
- Ground 1 – Procedural irregularity (see [6] above)
- Discussion and Analysis
- THE APPEAL Ground 1 – Compliance with de-stamping obligations (see [5] above)
- Actions required if goods carry fiscal marks or duty stamps
- Ground 2 – Evidence of export (see [5] above)
- What supporting evidence do I need to submit with my drawback claim form?
- The supporting evidence you need to submit with your drawback claim form
- HMRC’s submissions
- Discussion and analysis
- Discussion and Analysis
- Conclusions
![[2025] UKUT 00315 (TCC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_ICfrj4g.png)