THE CROSS APPEAL
THE CROSS APPEAL
Ground 3 - The FTT erred in concluding that it had jurisdiction to consider the reasonableness of HMRC’s exercise of their discretion (see [6] above)
The Law
HMRC’s powers in relation to claims for drawback of excise duty
Section 133 of the Customs and Excise Management Act 1979 makes general provisions as to the form and manner in which claims for the drawback of any excise duty should be made.
Section 2(1)-(2) of the Finance (No 2) Act 1992 contain the powers for the making of regulations to provide for the drawback of excise duty, such as the EGDR, in the following terms:
“Power to provide for drawback of excise duty.
(1) Subject to the following provisions of this section, the Commissioners may, in relation to any duties of excise, by regulations make provision
(a) conferring an entitlement to drawback of duty in prescribed cases where the Commissioners are satisfied that goods chargeable with duty have not been, and will not be, consumed in the United Kingdom; and.
(b) conferring an entitlement to drawback of duty, in prescribed cases, on the shipment as stores, or warehousing in an excise warehouse for use as stores, of goods chargeable with duty
(2) The power of the Commissioners to make regulations under this section shall include power—
(a) to provide for, or for the imposition of, the conditions to which an entitlement to drawback under the regulations is to be subject;
- Heading
- INTRODUCTION
- BACKGROUND – HMRC’S REFUSAL OF EXCISE DUTY DRAWBACK CLAIM
- THE APPEAL AND CROSS APPEAL
- THE CROSS APPEAL
- to provide for the determination of the person on whom any such entitlement is conferred
- The FTT’s powers on appeal against a drawback decision
- The FTT Decision
- HMRC’s submissions
- The FTT’s lack of a general public law jurisdiction
- Specific considerations applicable to s16(5) FA 94
- Discussion and Analysis
- The public law jurisdiction of the FTT
- Ground 2 – Waiver of time limit for drawback claim (see [6] above)
- HMRC’s original and review decisions
- The FTT Decision
- In late 2019, he wrote to HMRC. The letter stated
- The letter was sent under a covering email which stated
- HMRC’s submissions
- Discussion and Analysis
- Ground 1 – Procedural irregularity (see [6] above)
- Discussion and Analysis
- THE APPEAL Ground 1 – Compliance with de-stamping obligations (see [5] above)
- Actions required if goods carry fiscal marks or duty stamps
- Ground 2 – Evidence of export (see [5] above)
- What supporting evidence do I need to submit with my drawback claim form?
- The supporting evidence you need to submit with your drawback claim form
- HMRC’s submissions
- Discussion and analysis
- Discussion and Analysis
- Conclusions
![[2025] UKUT 00315 (TCC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_ICfrj4g.png)