BL-2021-002235 - [2025] EWHC 1966 (Ch)
Chancery Division of the High Court

BL-2021-002235 - [2025] EWHC 1966 (Ch)

Fecha: 01-Ago-2025

Judicial signature

Judicial signature

58.

Although I do not think it appears in the respondent’s affidavit, I mention here for completeness the point raised in correspondence in December 2024, that the order of 2022 was invalid because not signed by the judge. I have already set out the relevant terms of CPR rule 40.2 earlier in this judgment. There is no such requirement of judicial signature, and accordingly the order was not invalid on that basis.