![[2025] EWHC 2501 (Ch)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_O3rEzCI.png){kind=logo}
Heading
Neutral Citation No [2025] EWHC 2501 (Ch)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICEBL-2021-BHM-000065
BUSINESS AND PROPERTY COURTS IN BIRMINGHAM
BUSINESS LIST (ChD)
Priory Courts
33 Bull Street
Birmingham
Before HIS HONOUR JUDGE RAWLINGS
IN THE MATTER OF
SANMAN PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LIMITED Applicant
-v-
(1) SAMUEL GINDA
(2) TGDM ONE LIMITED Respondents
MR WATSON appeared on behalf of the Applicant
MR ROBINS KC appeared on behalf of the Respondents
Hearing 3 September 2025
Handed down on 2 October 2025
- Heading
- INTRODUCTION
- THE PERMISSION APPLIED FOR
- EVIDENCE
- THE NEED FOR PERMISSION
- “It has been emphasised that the court should exercise great caution before giving permission to bring proceedings [and] should not do so unless there is a strong case both that the statement in quest
- APPLYING THE LEGAL PRINCIPLES TO THE GROUNDS
- Significance of and use to which the Statement was put/motive
- THE PUBLIC INTEREST
- Prosecutorial Motive
- Would contempt proceedings justify the court’s and other resources which would be devoted to them?/Proportionality
- Furthering the Overriding Objective
- Likely Penalty
- Is Sanman a Proper Person to bring the Contempt proceedings?
- The Need for Great Caution
- GROUNDS 3 AND 4
- Does Sanman have a Strong Prima Facie Case that the statement is false?
- Does Sanman have a Strong Prima Facie Case that Mr Ginda knew the Statement to be untrue?
- The significance of the false statement, use to which it was put and Mr Ginda’s motive
- Conclusions