C v C
[2001] 1 FLR 624, Johnson J said:- “The first [of two particular factors justifying a stay of the English petition] is the positive and joint decision to execute the pre-marital contract in France according to French law in terms which envisaged issues, such as those presently arising, being resolved according to the French Civil Code…The inference must surely be that both this husband and this wife determined…that their financial and property disputes, should they arise, should be dealt with according to the French Civil Code and, I infer, in France”.64.Finally, in
- JUDGMENT
- The relevant history
- Pierburg v Pierburg
- Z v Z
- The law I have to apply
- Rogers-Headicar v Headicar
- Marinos v Marinos
- V v V
- Pierburg
- IB v FA
- Burden and standard of proof
- Language barrier
- Lucas
- Marinos
- Discretionary stay
- de Dampierre v de Dampierre
- S v S
- C v C
- Ella v Ella
- Tan v Choy
- Otobo v Otobo
- The evidence that I heard
- My conclusions on habitual residence
- Stay