Z v Z
[2010] 1 FLR 694 where Ryder J accorded real significance to whether an intention to change habitual residence was communicated to the other spouse. In relation to forum, they also complain that the Wife has not backed up her assertions as to the position in Norway, with expert Norwegian law.
- JUDGMENT
- The relevant history
- Pierburg v Pierburg
- Z v Z
- The law I have to apply
- Rogers-Headicar v Headicar
- Marinos v Marinos
- V v V
- Pierburg
- IB v FA
- Burden and standard of proof
- Language barrier
- Lucas
- Marinos
- Discretionary stay
- de Dampierre v de Dampierre
- S v S
- C v C
- Ella v Ella
- Tan v Choy
- Otobo v Otobo
- The evidence that I heard
- My conclusions on habitual residence
- Stay