KB-2024-004175 - [2025] EWHC 2050 (KB)
Fecha: 01-Ago-2025
Heading

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL
Before :
Richard Wright KC Sitting as a Deputy Judge of the High Court
Between :
TELEDYNE UK LIMITED | Claimant |
- and - | |
(1) JULIAN ALLEN GAO (2) – (7) OTHER NAMED DEFENDANTS AS LISTED AT SCHEDULE 1 TO THE CLAIM FORM (8) PERSONS UNKNOWN WHO ARE WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF THE CLAIMANT ENTERING OR REMAINING ON LAND AND IN OR ON BUILDINGS ON ANY OF THE SITES LISTED IN SCHEDULE 2 TO THE CLAIM FORM, THOSE BEING: A. THE ‘SHIPLEY SITE’ (TELEDYNE UK LIMITED, AIREDALE HOUSE, ACORN PARK, SHIPLEY BD17 7SW); B. THE ‘LINCOLN SITE’ (TELEDYNE UK LIMITED, 168 SADLER ROAD, LINCOLN LN6 3RS); C. THE ‘WIRRAL SITE’ (TELEDYNE UK LIMITED, UNIT A, 6 TEBAY ROAD, BROMBOROUGH, BIRKENHEAD, WIRRAL CH62 3PA); D. THE ‘CHELMSFORD SITE’ (TELEDYNE UK LIMITED, 106 WATERHOUSE LANE, CHELMSFORD CM1 2QU); E. THE ‘PRESTEIGNE SITE’ (TELEDYNE UK LIMITED, BROADAXE BUSINESS PARK, PRESTEIGNE LD8 2UH); AND F. THE ‘NEWBURY SITE’ (TELEDYNE UK LIMITED, REYNOLDS NAVIGATION HOUSE, CANAL VIEW ROAD, NEWBURY RG14 5UR). (9) PERSONS UNKNOWN WHO FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROTESTING ARE OBSTRUCTING ANY VEHICLE ACCESSING THE ‘SHIPLEY SITE’ (TELEDYNE UK LIMITED, AIREDALE HOUSE, ACORN PARK, SHIPLEY BD17 7SW) FROM THE HIGHWAY (10) PERSONS UNKNOWN WHO FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROTESTING ARE OBSTRUCTING ANY VEHICLE ACCESSING THE HIGHWAY FROM THE ‘SHIPLEY SITE’ (TELEDYNE UK LIMITED, AIREDALE HOUSE, ACORN PARK, SHIPLEY BD17 7SW) (11) PERSONS UNKNOWN WHO FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROTESTING ARE CAUSING THE BLOCKING, SLOWING DOWN, OBSTRUCTING OR OTHERWISE INTERFERING WITH THE FREE FLOW OF TRAFFIC ON TO, OFF OR ALONG THE ROADS LISTED AT SCHEDULE 3 TO THE CLAIM FORM (12) – (20) OTHER NAMED DEFENDANTS AS LISTED AT SCHEDULE 1 TO THE CLAIM FORM | Defendants |
Natalie Pratt (instructed by Keystone Law) for the Claimant
The Defendants did not attend and were not represented
Hearing date: 25th July 2025
Approved Judgment
- Heading
- Section 1
- The Claim
- Factual Background
- Procedural History
- This Application
- Procedural Requirement – Notice of the Hearing
- The Law
- Article 10 and Article 11 rights: proportionality
- Article 10 and 11 rights: Trespass
- Persons Unknown
- Evidence
- Decision
- Requirements for the Grant of a Final Injunction
- Articles 10 and 11 of the ECHR
- Review of the Injunction against Persons Unknown
- Form of Order
- Length of the Order
- Conclusion
- Postscript: Costs Order D19 and D20
- ANNEXE A
- and
- Defendants
- For the purpose of this Order
- INJUNCTION Until and including 25 July 2030, the First to Seventh Defendants , Eighth to Eleventh Defendants (Persons Unknown), Fourteenth Defendant, Sixteenth Defendant, Seventeenth Defendant, Nineteenth Defend
- Service and notification Pursuant to CPR rules 6.15 and 6.27, the Claimant has permission to serve the First to Seventh Defendants, Fourteenth Defendant, Sixteenth Defendant, Seventeenth Defendant, Nineteenth Defendant and th
- Liberty to Apply
- The Order against the Eighth to Eleventh Defendants (Persons Unknown) shall be reviewed at a hearing no later than 25 July 2026 (or as near to that date as the court can reasonably accommodate), with
- All communications with the Court about this Order should be sent to [email protected] or Room E03 Royal Courts of Justice, Strand, London WC2A 2LL. The Telephone number is 020 3938
- Costs
- No Order as to costs against the Eighth to Eleventh Defendants (Persons Unknown) Dated 25 July 2025
- Interpretation of this Order In this Order, references to ‘the Defendant’ means any or all of them (unless expressly stated otherwise)
- An Order requiring ‘the Defendant’ not to do anything applies to all Defendants Conclusions