KB-2024-004175 - [2025] EWHC 2050 (KB)

As I have stated at Paragraph 49 (above) I accept the submissions of the Claimant that in reviewing the Order against Persons Unknown I am not required to make fresh Wolverhampton and Ziegler assessments; the Court has previously been satisfied of those requirements and the Valero procedural requirements before granting interim relief.

On review I am satisfied that there are no grounds for the discharge or variation of the relief against Persons Unknown as granted previously (subject to one minor amendment to one of the terms of the final Order that gives proper effect to a right of way running through the Claimant’s land). The factual analysis and reasoning that justifies the making of the final Order against the Named Defendants applies equally to the need for an Order against defined categories of Persons Unknown. Even if I had been satisfied that I was required to make a fresh assessment I would have been satisfied that an Order against Persons Unknown was justified on the evidence that I have read and considered and the conclusions I have reached upon it.