Case No. HT-11-503
Technology and Construction Court

Case No. HT-11-503

Fecha: 31-Jul-2012

Invoice 177: Urinal and Furniture

181.Again, Mr Woodall had originally agreed that these items should be taken out because they related to portable items such as spin tables, ice bins and so on. Mr Woodall was seeking to add back 50% of the total of these items, but again the basis of that was not made plain. Furthermore, it did not appear that the bar work was not sufficiently advanced at the time of the second inundation for any loss to flow from these items in any event. For all these reasons, I again refuse to allow back in this arbitrary 50%. viii)