UT (Tax & Chancery) UT-2022-0000150 - [2024] UKUT 00254 (TCC)
Fecha: 10-Jul-2024
The standing of the NEDs
The standing of the NEDs
The following individuals accepted office as Saranac’s NEDs:
Robert Elliott, former Chair of Linklaters LLP (“Linklaters”);
Richard Berliand, Chair of TP ICAP PLC and formerly the Managing Director of JP Morgan;
Gordon Neilly, former Chief of Staff and Head of Strategy at Standard Life
Aberdeen PLC;
Martin Gilbert, former CEO of Aberdeen Asset Management and joint CEO of Standard Life Aberdeen PLC (“Aberdeen”);
Jeffrey Walsh of Jupiter Capital Partners LLC; and
David Bloom, Founder of Goldacre Ventures and a partner of the Noé Group.
Saranac’s position is that individuals of that calibre would not have accepted a NED role unless they regarded Mr Kalaris to be a fit and proper person; the Saranac assessment emphasises that all but one of the NEDs had accepted the role when Mr Kalaris was still facing criminal charges.
However, the mere fact that an individual accepted a NED role in Saranac does not lead to the necessary inference that he also regards Mr Kalaris as a fit and proper person. Apart from Mr Elliott and Mr Neilly, whose references we consider below, none of the NEDs had explained why they had accepted the role. We therefore make no finding based on the standing of the NEDs.
Mr Kalaris’s work at Saranac
The references provided by Mr Elliott and Mr Neilly did include evidence about the work carried out by Mr Kalaris at Saranac.
- Heading
- Introduction and Summary
- The Barclays references
- The Tribunal’s view
- Subsequently
- Legislation, case law and the Handbook
- The legislation and related case law
- The Handbook
- The Decision Notice
- Evidence
- The evidence on the capital raising issue
- Mr Beauchamp
- Mr Tinney
- Mr Perry
- Mr Mason
- Mr Biesinger
- Findings of fact
- Mr Kalaris
- Capital raising, GenVen and the Interviews
- The criminal proceedings
- Saranac
- The SWF initiative
- The economic situation
- The ASA
- The link between the ASA and the capital raising
- The text of the ASA
- The Prospectus
- The second capital raising and PCP
- The 2013 Interview
- What Mr Kalaris knew
- What the Authority knew
- What Mr Kalaris believed about the Authority’s knowledge
- Mr Kalaris’s responses relied on by the Authority
- Question 1: The “genesis of the agreement”
- Q1: The Authority’s position
- Who came up with the idea?
- The two paths
- Strategic relationship
- Unnecessary?
- The Tribunal’s findings
- Question 2: the purpose
- Q2: The Authority’s position
- Q2: Saranac’s position
- Q2: The Tribunal’s findings
- Question 3: the calculation
- Q3: The Authority’s position
- Q3: Saranac’s position
- Q3: The Tribunal’s findings
- Question 4: connection
- Q4: Saranac’s position
- Q4: The Tribunal’s findings
- Motive?
- Overall conclusion on the 2013 Interview
- THE 2014 INTERVIEW
- The culture at Barclays Wealth Americas
- The cultural audit
- The pre-meeting communications
- Briefing and the subsequent meetings
- Ms Hilgart
- The Cultural Workshop
- The Whistleblower email
- The Fed update
- The 2014 Interview
- The position of the parties
- Discussion and consideration
- The briefing on 30 March 2012
- The meeting on 5 April
- The meeting on 10 December 2012
- The weekend of 14-15 December 2012
- Overall findings
- OTHER FINDINGS
- The other evidence
- The Saranac assessment
- The personal references
- The capital raising and the GenVen Report
- Financial services experience
- Mr Kalaris’s approach to regulatory requirements in the past
- Compliance with restrictions
- Training
- The standing of the NEDs
- Mr Elliott
- Mr Neilly
- The Tribunal’s conclusion
- Conclusions