(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations– Environment– Directive 2002/49

Fecha: 13-Ene-2022

7On 25June 2010, the Slovak authorities communicated to the Commission, by means of the Reportnet electronic portal of the European Environmental Information and Observation Network (Eionet), a list of agglomerations, major roads, major railways and major airports falling within the scope of Directive 2002/49. On 16January 2014, it updated that lis...

In Case C‑118/20

Fecha: 18-Ene-2022

Convention on the Reduction of Statelessness 3Article7(2) of the United Nations Convention on the Reduction of Statelessness, which was adopted in New York on 30August 1961 and entered into force on 13December 1975 (‘the Convention on the Reduction of Statelessness’), provides: ‘A national of a Contracting State who seeks naturalisation in a forei...

In Case C‑361/20

Fecha: 13-Ene-2022

2Article45(1) of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union, in the version applicable to the dispute (‘the Staff Regulations’), is worded as follows: ‘Promotion shall be by decision of the appointing authority in the light of Article6(2). Unless the procedure laid down in Articles4 and 29(1) is applied, officials may only be promote...

In Case C‑51/20

Fecha: 20-Ene-2022

18Following delivery of the judgment establishing the failure to fulfil obligations, on 15November 2017 the Commission sent a letter to the Greek authorities asking them to recover the unlawful aid incompatible with the internal market, to which the latter authorities failed to reply. 19On 13November 2018, by letter sent to the Greek Minister for ...

In Case C‑599/21

Fecha: 17-Ene-2022

23Under Article137 of the Rules of Procedure, applicable to proceedings on appeal pursuant to Article184(1) of those rules, a decision as to costs is to be given in the order which closes the proceedings. 24Since the present order was adopted before the appeal was served on the other party to the proceedings and, therefore, before that party could ...

In Case C‑638/19

Fecha: 25-Ene-2022

3The Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States, concluded in Washington on 18March 1965 (‘the ICSID Convention’), which entered into force with respect to Romania on 12October 1975, provides in Article53(1): ‘The award shall be binding on the parties and shall not be subject to any appeal or t...

In Case C‑788/19

Fecha: 27-Ene-2022

6By letter of formal notice of 20November 2015, the Commission drew the attention of the Spanish authorities to the incompatibility with EU law of certain aspects of the obligation to declare overseas assets or rights by means of ‘Form 720’. In its view, the consequences of failure to comply with that obligation were disproportionate in the light o...

In Case T-273/21

Fecha: 19-Ene-2022

5Under Article144(6) of the Rules of Procedure, if the application to intervene is refused, the order must include a decision as to the costs relating to the application to intervene, including the costs of the applicant for leave to intervene, pursuant to Articles134, 135 and 138. 6As the present order was adopted prior to service of the applicati...

In Case T‑136/19

Fecha: 21-Ene-2022

9Article144(7) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court states: ‘If the application to intervene is granted, the intervener shall receive a copy of every procedural document served on the main parties, save, where applicable, for the confidential information excluded from such communication [by order of the President of the Chamber before whi...

In Case T‑195/19

Fecha: 09-Feb-2022

24On 31October 2018, the applicant requested the Commission to repay to it the amount of the fine which it had paid on a provisional basis, including interest. In that regard, it noted that the 2016 decision, which is the legal basis for the amounts paid, had been set aside by the Court in its judgment of 18October 2018, GEA Group v Commission (T‑...

In Case T‑27/19

Fecha: 02-Feb-2022

135The applicants submit that the contested decision is vitiated since the ECB did not exercise its discretion or exercised it inappropriately. 136The applicants state that the fact that the ECB decided to withdraw the authorisation implies that it considered that it had no discretion, that it merely confirmed the fait accompli by the MFSA and tha...

In Case T‑286/09

Fecha: 26-Ene-2022

3On 18October 2000, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (‘AMD’) filed a formal complaint with the Commission of the European Communities under Article3 of Council Regulation (EEC) No17 of 6February 1962, First Regulation implementing Articles [101] and [102 TFEU] (OJ, English Special Edition, 1959-1962 (I), p.87), which it further supplemented by putting...

In Case T‑323/21

Fecha: 10-Ene-2022

12In accordance with Article173(1) of the Rules of Procedure, a party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal other than the applicant may participate, as intervener, in the proceedings before the General Court by responding to the application in the manner and within the time limit prescribed. 13As is recognised in the second paragraph of Ar...

In Case T‑33/20

Fecha: 09-Feb-2022

8The applicant, MrIvo Van Walle, was recruited on 1November 2010 by ECDC as a member of the temporary staff. On 23March 2015 his contract was renewed until 31October 2020. At that stage, ECDC decided not to renew his contract. 9On 18July 2017, ECDC published a vacancy notice for a post for which the applicant applied on 27August 2017. His applicati...

In Case T‑536/20

Fecha: 02-Feb-2022

23By application lodged at the Court Registry on 25August 2020, the applicant brought the present action. 24The defence was lodged on 4January 2021, the reply was lodged on 10March 2021 and the rejoinder was lodged on 26April 2021. 25The written part of the procedure was closed on 30April 2021. 26As the parties had not requested a hearing under Art...

In Case T‑730/19

Fecha: 04-Ene-2022

17Under Article137 of the Rules of Procedure, where a case does not proceed to judgment, the costs are to be in the discretion of the Court. 18In the light of the circumstances of the present case, the applicants must be ordered to bear their own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the ECB, with the exception of those relating to the application...