A v A
[2007] 2 FLR 467 as to the strong and natural presumption against holding a provision or document to be a sham, which I entirely accept. Mr Pointer, however, does not accept that he needs to prove that the 2012 structure was a sham. He argues that all he needs to show is that Sarla and Ahuti hold the shares either on trust or as nominee for Ashish. In this regard, he relies on
- Second and Third Respondents
- MR JUSTICE MOOR:-
- The Law
- Wisnieswki (a Minor) v Central Manchester Health Authority
- Snook v London and West Riding Investments Ltd
- A v A
- Prest v Petrodel Resources Ltd
- Goodman v Gallant
- The history
- Ashish J Thakkar, Non-Executive Director
- The oral evidence
- The pleadings
- Snook
- Conclusion