Snook v London and West Riding Investments Ltd
[1967] 2 QB 786 at 802:-
“[a sham] means acts done or documents executed by the parties to the “sham” which are intended by them to give to third parties or to the courts the appearance of creating between the parties, legal rights and obligations different from the actual legal rights and obligations (if any) which the parties intend to create”.
8.I was also referred to the case of
- Second and Third Respondents
- MR JUSTICE MOOR:-
- The Law
- Wisnieswki (a Minor) v Central Manchester Health Authority
- Snook v London and West Riding Investments Ltd
- A v A
- Prest v Petrodel Resources Ltd
- Goodman v Gallant
- The history
- Ashish J Thakkar, Non-Executive Director
- The oral evidence
- The pleadings
- Snook
- Conclusion