The pleadings
65.Before making my findings of fact, I should deal briefly with Mr Scott’s submission that the pleadings are defective and do not show a reasonable cause of action. I disagree. I remind myself that the Applicant was hampered by not even having the regulations when she had to plead her case. That was not her fault. The pleadings make it abundantly clear that she is saying that Ashish, not Ahuti, Sarla or anyone else, is the beneficial owner of the Mara Group. There was no doubt about this. The Respondents were not disadvantaged and I reject the complaint.
- Second and Third Respondents
- MR JUSTICE MOOR:-
- The Law
- Wisnieswki (a Minor) v Central Manchester Health Authority
- Snook v London and West Riding Investments Ltd
- A v A
- Prest v Petrodel Resources Ltd
- Goodman v Gallant
- The history
- Ashish J Thakkar, Non-Executive Director
- The oral evidence
- The pleadings
- Snook
- Conclusion