MR JUSTICE MOOR:-
1.I have been hearing two preliminary issues in relation to a financial remedy application dated 27th June 2014 made by the Applicant, Meera Thakkar against the First Respondent, Ashish Thakkar. The preliminary issues are:-(a)The terms on which the First Respondent’s mother, Sarla Thakkar (the Second Respondent) and his sister, Ahuti Chug (the Third Respondent) hold the shares in Inspire Holdings Group Ltd; and(b)The extent of his interest in Inspire Holdings Group Ltd, Mara Group Holdings Ltd (hereafter “the Group”) and/or any of the underlying companies or assets.2.For convenience purposes alone, I propose to refer to the parties by their first names, namely:-(a)The Applicant, Meera Thakkar as Meera;(b)The First Respondent, Ashish Thakkar as Ashish;(c)The Second Respondent, Sarla Thakkar as Sarla;(d)The Third Respondent, Ahuti Chug as Ahuti;(e)The First Respondent’s father, Jagdish Thakkar as Jagdish;(f)The First Respondent’s eldest sister, Rona Kotecha as Rona;(g)The Applicant’s brother, Prashant Manek as Prashant.
- Second and Third Respondents
- MR JUSTICE MOOR:-
- The Law
- Wisnieswki (a Minor) v Central Manchester Health Authority
- Snook v London and West Riding Investments Ltd
- A v A
- Prest v Petrodel Resources Ltd
- Goodman v Gallant
- The history
- Ashish J Thakkar, Non-Executive Director
- The oral evidence
- The pleadings
- Snook
- Conclusion
