Conclusion
80.It follows that I answer the questions posed in the following way:-(a)The First Respondent’s mother, Sarla Thakkar (the Second Respondent) and his sister, Ahuti Chug (the Third Respondent) hold the shares in Inspire Holdings Group Ltd as nominee/bare trustee for the First Respondent, Ashish Thakkar; and(b)The extent of Ashish’s interest in Inspire Holdings Group Ltd, Mara Group Holdings Ltd (hereafter “the Group”) and/or any of the underlying companies or assets is 100%.Mr Justice Moor10th February 2017
- Second and Third Respondents
- MR JUSTICE MOOR:-
- The Law
- Wisnieswki (a Minor) v Central Manchester Health Authority
- Snook v London and West Riding Investments Ltd
- A v A
- Prest v Petrodel Resources Ltd
- Goodman v Gallant
- The history
- Ashish J Thakkar, Non-Executive Director
- The oral evidence
- The pleadings
- Snook
- Conclusion