King's / Queen's Bench Division of the High Court
QB-2022-001397 - [2025] EWHC 2193 (KB)
Fecha: 22-Ago-2025
The Guardian’s application for evidence to be ruled inadmissible
The Guardian’s application for evidence to be ruled inadmissible
The Guardian gave notice, in its skeleton argument exchanged prior to the PTR, of its application for a ruling that certain parts of the witness statements served by the Claimant are inadmissible and should be struck out. The application was adjourned to the start of the trial and I heard it over the course of the first two days of the trial. In his oral submissions, Mr Williams made concessions in respect of numerous passages, and I gave an ex tempore judgment on 6 March 2025 on the admissibility of passages that remained in dispute: Clarke v Guardian [2024] EWHC 994 (KB).
- Heading
- Index
- Post-trial submissions regarding the meaning of the meanings
- Pleadings, meaning trial and listing of the trial
- Disclosure and Inspection
- Exchange of witness statements
- Pre-trial review
- Mr Clarke’s application to strike out the defence
- The Guardian’s application to summons Arnold Oceng
- The Guardian’s application to call ‘Ivy’
- Mr Clarke’s application to re-amend the Amended Reply
- Mr Clarke’s application to rely on his second witness statement
- The Guardian’s application for evidence to be ruled inadmissible
- Mr Clarke’s Transcripts Application
- Mr Clarke’s Redactions Application
- Mr Clarke’s withdrawn applications to serve witness summaries and summonses
- Mr Clarke’s application for special measures
- The Guardian’s application to call ‘Anita’
- Applications on the disclosure of explicit photographs of ‘Ivy’
- The Guardian’s application for Mr Moore to give evidence by video link
- Post-hearing submissions
- Mr Clarke’s live witnesses
- Arnold Oceng
- Hearsay statements from the Claimant’s witnesses
- The Guardian’s live witnesses: truth defence
- The Guardian’s hearsay witnesses: truth defence
- The Guardian’s live witnesses: public interest defence
- Overview
- The initial group of seven
- The Guardian’s team
- The sources for the first article
- Alleged involvement of Adam Deacon
- The Hostility Issue
- The Verification Issue
- The Contamination Issue
- The Reply Issue
- The Deletion Issue
- Conclusions