King's / Queen's Bench Division of the High Court
QB-2022-001397 - [2025] EWHC 2193 (KB)
Fecha: 22-Ago-2025
The Guardian’s application to call ‘Ivy’
The Guardian’s application to call ‘Ivy’
On 28 February 2025, the Guardian applied for permission to call ‘Ivy’ as a witness, and to adduce her witness statement dated 25 February 2025 as her evidence-in-chief. The Guardian also sought relief from sanctions, in circumstances where ‘Ivy’s’ statement had not been filed and served by 5 December 2024. The Claimant confirmed on the first day of the trial that he did not object and I granted the order sought on 5 March 2025.
- Heading
- Index
- Post-trial submissions regarding the meaning of the meanings
- Pleadings, meaning trial and listing of the trial
- Disclosure and Inspection
- Exchange of witness statements
- Pre-trial review
- Mr Clarke’s application to strike out the defence
- The Guardian’s application to summons Arnold Oceng
- The Guardian’s application to call ‘Ivy’
- Mr Clarke’s application to re-amend the Amended Reply
- Mr Clarke’s application to rely on his second witness statement
- The Guardian’s application for evidence to be ruled inadmissible
- Mr Clarke’s Transcripts Application
- Mr Clarke’s Redactions Application
- Mr Clarke’s withdrawn applications to serve witness summaries and summonses
- Mr Clarke’s application for special measures
- The Guardian’s application to call ‘Anita’
- Applications on the disclosure of explicit photographs of ‘Ivy’
- The Guardian’s application for Mr Moore to give evidence by video link
- Post-hearing submissions
- Mr Clarke’s live witnesses
- Arnold Oceng
- Hearsay statements from the Claimant’s witnesses
- The Guardian’s live witnesses: truth defence
- The Guardian’s hearsay witnesses: truth defence
- The Guardian’s live witnesses: public interest defence
- Overview
- The initial group of seven
- The Guardian’s team
- The sources for the first article
- Alleged involvement of Adam Deacon
- The Hostility Issue
- The Verification Issue
- The Contamination Issue
- The Reply Issue
- The Deletion Issue
- Conclusions