![QB-2022-001397 - [2025] EWHC 2193 (KB)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_AJKZXmE.png){kind=logo}
King's / Queen's Bench Division of the High Court
QB-2022-001397 - [2025] EWHC 2193 (KB)
Fecha: 22-Ago-2025
The Guardian’s application to call ‘Anita’
The Guardian’s application to call ‘Anita’
The Guardian made an application on the evening of Friday 14 March 2025 (day 8) for permission to call at trial a new witness and to adduce her witness statement of the same date. I granted anonymity and reporting restrictions in respect of the proposed new witness, who is pseudonymised as ‘Anita’. I heard the application on Monday 17 March 2025 (day 9) and refused it for the reasons given in my ex tempore judgment: Clarke v Guardian [2025] EWHC 995 (KB).
- Heading
- Index
- Post-trial submissions regarding the meaning of the meanings
- Pleadings, meaning trial and listing of the trial
- Disclosure and Inspection
- Exchange of witness statements
- Pre-trial review
- Mr Clarke’s application to strike out the defence
- The Guardian’s application to summons Arnold Oceng
- The Guardian’s application to call ‘Ivy’
- Mr Clarke’s application to re-amend the Amended Reply
- Mr Clarke’s application to rely on his second witness statement
- The Guardian’s application for evidence to be ruled inadmissible
- Mr Clarke’s Transcripts Application
- Mr Clarke’s Redactions Application
- Mr Clarke’s withdrawn applications to serve witness summaries and summonses
- Mr Clarke’s application for special measures
- The Guardian’s application to call ‘Anita’
- Applications on the disclosure of explicit photographs of ‘Ivy’
- The Guardian’s application for Mr Moore to give evidence by video link
- Post-hearing submissions
- Mr Clarke’s live witnesses
- Arnold Oceng
- Hearsay statements from the Claimant’s witnesses
- The Guardian’s live witnesses: truth defence
- The Guardian’s hearsay witnesses: truth defence
- The Guardian’s live witnesses: public interest defence
- Overview
- The initial group of seven
- The Guardian’s team
- The sources for the first article
- Alleged involvement of Adam Deacon
- The Hostility Issue
- The Verification Issue
- The Contamination Issue
- The Reply Issue
- The Deletion Issue
- Conclusions