QB-2022-001397 - [2025] EWHC 2193 (KB)
Fecha: 22-Ago-2025
The initial group of seven
The initial group of seven
The initial contact was made by Ms El Hosaini to Homa Khaleeli, then the Guardian’s deputy features editor. On Thursday 1 April 2021, Ms Khaleeli told Mr Lewis that Ms El Hosaini and her husband, Mr Krishna Floyd, had information about Mr Clarke’s past conduct which was surfacing in the context of the announcement by BAFTA, on 29 March 2021, that he would be given the Outstanding British Contribution to Cinema Award at the ceremony on 10 April 2021. Mr Lewis spoke directly to Ms El Hosaini and Mr Krishna Floyd on 1 April 2021. He read the letter that they, together with Ms Akindude, had sent by email to their contacts at BAFTA, including the Chair of BAFTA, on 29 March 2021, and BAFTA’s response. The way in which the letter was written, being well-composed, careful and sensitive towards the alleged victims, reinforced the impression Mr Lewis had gained that they were “acting responsibly and with good intentions”.
Mr Lewis learned that a group of seven had recently coalesced. For source protection reasons, the only members of this group that Mr Lewis named were Ms El Hosaini and Mr Krishna Floyd. I find that Ms Akindude, who had been working with Ms El Hosaini, was part of the group. The three of them came together, following BAFTA’s announcement on 29 March 2021, with a group of four which I find consisted of Ms Lusi, ‘Maya’, Mr Proctor and ‘Imogen’. Mr Lewis was told that some members of the group of four had written to BAFTA anonymously. One such message was from Mr Proctor.
Following further exploratory conversations, and receipt from Ms El Hosaini of information from three anonymous alleged victims, on Tuesday 6 April 2021, Mr Lewis decided, in consultation with Mr Gibson, that the matter warranted investigation.
- Heading
- Index
- Post-trial submissions regarding the meaning of the meanings
- Pleadings, meaning trial and listing of the trial
- Disclosure and Inspection
- Exchange of witness statements
- Pre-trial review
- Mr Clarke’s application to strike out the defence
- The Guardian’s application to summons Arnold Oceng
- The Guardian’s application to call ‘Ivy’
- Mr Clarke’s application to re-amend the Amended Reply
- Mr Clarke’s application to rely on his second witness statement
- The Guardian’s application for evidence to be ruled inadmissible
- Mr Clarke’s Transcripts Application
- Mr Clarke’s Redactions Application
- Mr Clarke’s withdrawn applications to serve witness summaries and summonses
- Mr Clarke’s application for special measures
- The Guardian’s application to call ‘Anita’
- Applications on the disclosure of explicit photographs of ‘Ivy’
- The Guardian’s application for Mr Moore to give evidence by video link
- Post-hearing submissions
- Mr Clarke’s live witnesses
- Arnold Oceng
- Hearsay statements from the Claimant’s witnesses
- The Guardian’s live witnesses: truth defence
- The Guardian’s hearsay witnesses: truth defence
- The Guardian’s live witnesses: public interest defence
- Overview
- The initial group of seven
- The Guardian’s team
- The sources for the first article
- Alleged involvement of Adam Deacon
- The Hostility Issue
- The Verification Issue
- The Contamination Issue
- The Reply Issue
- The Deletion Issue
- Conclusions