![[2025] UKUT 262 (AAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_3a2BKne.png){kind=logo}
The parties’ skeleton arguments
The parties’ skeleton arguments
CICA
Due to a mix-up, it was only at the outset of the hearing on 28 April 2025 that I was made aware that CICA had provided a skeleton argument. After a short delay, I was provided with a copy of the skeleton argument which CICA had filed with the UTAAC office. CICA’s skeleton argument in essence repeated the grounds on which it had been given permission for this judicial review
- Heading
- I grant the application for judicial review of the decision of the Social Entitlement Chamber of the First-tier Tribunal of 4 March 2024 under the tribunal case reference 1698-1445-9671-4403 The Upper Tribunal’s order is
- REASONS FOR DECISION
- Relevant factual background
- The FTT’s decision
- The grounds on which permission to seek a judicial review was granted
- The parties’ skeleton arguments
- Interested party
- Relevant law
- Analysis and conclusion
- General observations
- Ground 1 - Dangerous Dogs Act 1991
- Ground 2 - Failure to have regard to paragraph 2 in Annex B
- Ground 3 – Distinction between intent and recklessness
- FTT’s decision was irrational or inadequately reasoned
- Conclusions