v Attorney General of Canada
2015 FC 46 ( CanLII ) . However , the Secretary of State was not able to assist with a submission as to what standard of proof the appellant would require to reach. 34. Despite these submissions on the availability of a defence of duress, the Secretary of State also submitted that duress did not constitute a defence in international criminal law and went only to mitigation. For this submission she relied upon the decision of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia in the case of
- Background and introduction
- ppellant’s
- espondent’s
- onduct
- osition
- JS (
- Iran
- nitial
- ssessment
- Zimbabwe
- MT Zimbabwe
- v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- respondent
- v Attorney General of Canada
- movic
- The submissions on duress for the appellant
- uress
- Duress
- Prosecutor v
- R v Hasan
- Fernandes
- v Canada (Attorney General)
- Our assessment of the appellant’s claim to have acted under duress
- R v Hassan
- Decision