Zimbabwe
[2012] UKUT 15. 30. Having assessed the appellant’s conduct in the manner we have , it is worth repeating the approach to article 1F as articulated by Lord Brown in JS (
Sri Lanka
) which the Upper Tribunal drew on in arriving at its decision in the case of
- Background and introduction
- ppellant’s
- espondent’s
- onduct
- osition
- JS (
- Iran
- nitial
- ssessment
- Zimbabwe
- MT Zimbabwe
- v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- respondent
- v Attorney General of Canada
- movic
- The submissions on duress for the appellant
- uress
- Duress
- Prosecutor v
- R v Hasan
- Fernandes
- v Canada (Attorney General)
- Our assessment of the appellant’s claim to have acted under duress
- R v Hassan
- Decision