Case No. UKUT-00330-(IAC)

, on the same date, decided to refuse to grant the Appellant asylum. This was not a decision on the merits: it was, rather, a decision based on the Appellant’s asserted failure to provide supporting evidence and attend for an interview when requested to do so. The FtT decision of September 2003 records the absence of any conceivable basis for an asylum claim. The only live issue was the Appellant’s case based on Article 8 ECHR. The appeal was dismissed on both asylum and human rights grounds. 7. This was followed by seven years unexplained inertia on the part of the Secretary of State. This somnambulance was disturbed only by a