Bah (EO-Turkey-Liability to Deport)
[2012] UKUT 00196 (IAC) (hereinafter “ Bah ”). Pausing again, some 1 ½ years later, the appeal remains uncompleted, for reasons which will emerge below. (k) Both parties’ representatives duly complied with the time limit (29 October 2015) for the provision of further submissions. The terms of the final paragraph of the Upper Tribunal’s directions suggest that, following receipt, the appeal would be decided without further hearing. The next development suggests that an assessment that a further hearing would be convened. (l) By further Directions dated 12 November 2015 it was directed that the appeal “ … will be set down for oral hearing,
- Preamble
- Introduction
- Chronology
- four
- Bah (EO-Turkey-Liability to Deport)
- submissions only
- September 2012
- also
- September 2003
- Lessons
- Determining this Appeal
- to find
- YM (Uganda)
- legal rules
- the Secretary of State’s policy
- Hesham Ali (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- R (Agyarko) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Hesham Ali
- THE HON. MR JUSTICE MCCLOSKEY
- Part 5A of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002
- 117A Application of this Part
- 117D Interpretation of this Part
- Immigration Rules
- Deportation and Article 8
