to find
that the Appellant is not a danger to the community and that the presumption in his case is inappropriate. ” [Our emphasis.] The FtT continued, at [24]: “ The presumption is that the Appellant’s deportation is in the public interest and under paragraph 398 it is only in exceptional circumstances that the public interest in deportation is outweighed by other factors.
- Preamble
- Introduction
- Chronology
- four
- Bah (EO-Turkey-Liability to Deport)
- submissions only
- September 2012
- also
- September 2003
- Lessons
- Determining this Appeal
- to find
- YM (Uganda)
- legal rules
- the Secretary of State’s policy
- Hesham Ali (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- R (Agyarko) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Hesham Ali
- THE HON. MR JUSTICE MCCLOSKEY
- Part 5A of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002
- 117A Application of this Part
- 117D Interpretation of this Part
- Immigration Rules
- Deportation and Article 8