UT (Tax & Chancery) UT-2024-000113 - [2025] UKUT 00165 (TCC)
Fecha: 08-Abr-2025
Case law
Case law
Knibbs
Before turning to Derry SC concerning the application of Schedule 1B TMA to claims for share loss relief under ITA, we explain how the appellate courts have considered trade loss relief. This relief was available under s.380 ICTA (and considered in De Silva to which we return in the discussion section) and then under the successor provision, s.64 ITA.
In Knibbs v HMRC [2019] EWCA Civ 1719 (“Knibbs”), the Court of Appeal explained the process by which claims to carry-back trade loss relief for post 2007 claims under s.64 ITA are governed by Schedule 1B TMA. It concluded that paragraph 2(3), Schedule 1B TMA applied to post 2007 claims for trade loss relief to treat them as relating to the later year. According to David Richards LJ at [45]-[47]:
Schedule 1B is headed “Claims for relief involving two or more years”. As we have already noted, claims for loss relief involving two or more years, i.e. carry-back claims, are expressly made subject to paragraph 2 of Schedule 1B by section 60(2) of ITA.
Paragraph 2 of Schedule 1B is headed “Loss relief” and materially provides as follows:
“2(1) This paragraph applies where a person makes a claim requiring relief for a loss incurred or treated as incurred, or a payment made, in one year of assessment (‘the later year’) to be given in an earlier year of assessment (‘the earlier year’).
- Heading
- INTRODUCTION
- THE FTT DECISION
- THE GROUNDS OF APPEAL TO THE UPPER TRIBUNAL
- THE HEARING
- FACTUAL BACKGROUND
- FIRST SHARE LOSS RELIEF ISSUE The FTT identified the first issue in the following terms at [48(1)]
- The Law
- Schedule 1A to this Act shall apply as respects any claim or election which—
- Section 42(2) of this Act shall not apply in relation to the claim The claim shall relate to the later year
- the claim does not have to be made in the return (paragraph 2(2))
- for both tax years
- Otherwise the claim must specify either the year of the loss or the previous tax year
- This subsection explains how the deductions are to be made
- If an individual—
- Case law
- Section 42(2) of this Act shall not apply in relation to the claim The claim shall relate to the later year
- Derry SC
- There were two issues before the Court
- Outline of the Appellant’s case
- Discussion and Analysis
- Prior to the ITA all loss relief claims under ICTA were to be made or treated in a similar way – Schedule 1B TMA applied There is no doubt that Schedule 1B TMA applied to trade loss relief claims made under s.380 ICTA
- The ITA made a limited but material change in the law from ICTA on share loss relief claims
- Appellant’s other arguments considered
- Summary
- Conclusion
- SECOND SHARE LOSS RELIEF ISSUE
- The Law
- An officer of the Board may enquire into— a claim made by any person, or
- Cotter
- Derry CA
- Derry SC
- HMRC’s case in outline
- The present case should have been distinguished on its facts from Derry CA The Appellant’s case in outline
- Discussion and Analysis
- Derry CA not binding: the ordinary rules of precedent
- Distinguishing Derry CA
- Remaking
- THE CLOSURE NOTICE ISSUE
- The Law
- state that in the officer's opinion no amendment of the claim is required, or
- A closure notice takes effect when it is issued…”
- Case law
- Outline of the Appellant’s case
- Discussion and Analysis
- Conclusions