UT (Tax & Chancery) UT-2024-000113 - [2025] UKUT 00165 (TCC)
Fecha: 08-Abr-2025
the claim does not have to be made in the return (paragraph 2(2))
the claim does not have to be made in the return (paragraph 2(2));
the claim relates to the later year (i.e. the year in which the loss arises) and not the earlier year (the year to which the loss is being carried back) (paragraph 2(3)); and
the amount of the claim is determined by reference to the reduction in the tax liability of the taxpayer in the earlier year on the assumption that effect were given to the claim (paragraph 2(4)).
Schedule 1B creates a separate and specific regime in which a claim that falls within paragraph 2 is treated as a standalone claim – in HMRC’s terminology a “free-standing credit” – which although it affects the amount of tax actually paid in the earlier tax year is dealt with separately from the return for that year. It is HMRC’s case that Mr Murphy’s claim for the tax year 2005/6 falls within that regime.”
As the FTT also observed: “Section 574 ICTA was repealed with effect from 5 April 2007. For the tax year 2007/8 onwards, the provisions governing share loss relief, including section 574 ICTA, were rewritten as part of the Tax Law Rewrite Project and incorporated in the Income Tax Act 2007 (“ITA”). They are now found in chapter 6 Part 4 ITA (principally, sections 131 to 133 ITA).”
S.131 ITA is the first of three sections under Chapter 6, dealing with “Share loss relief against general income”. S.131 provides that an individual is eligible for share loss relief if he incurs “an allowable loss for capital gains tax purposes” on the disposal of any “qualifying shares” in “any tax year”, defined as “the year of the loss”. “Qualifying shares” include shares in a “qualifying trading company”, the conditions for which are set out in sections 134 to 143.
S.132 ITA provides so far as relevant:
“Entitlement to claim
(1) An individual who is eligible for share loss relief may make a claim for the loss to be deducted in calculating the individual’s net income –
(a) for the year of the loss,
for the previous tax year, or
- Heading
- INTRODUCTION
- THE FTT DECISION
- THE GROUNDS OF APPEAL TO THE UPPER TRIBUNAL
- THE HEARING
- FACTUAL BACKGROUND
- FIRST SHARE LOSS RELIEF ISSUE The FTT identified the first issue in the following terms at [48(1)]
- The Law
- Schedule 1A to this Act shall apply as respects any claim or election which—
- Section 42(2) of this Act shall not apply in relation to the claim The claim shall relate to the later year
- the claim does not have to be made in the return (paragraph 2(2))
- for both tax years
- Otherwise the claim must specify either the year of the loss or the previous tax year
- This subsection explains how the deductions are to be made
- If an individual—
- Case law
- Section 42(2) of this Act shall not apply in relation to the claim The claim shall relate to the later year
- Derry SC
- There were two issues before the Court
- Outline of the Appellant’s case
- Discussion and Analysis
- Prior to the ITA all loss relief claims under ICTA were to be made or treated in a similar way – Schedule 1B TMA applied There is no doubt that Schedule 1B TMA applied to trade loss relief claims made under s.380 ICTA
- The ITA made a limited but material change in the law from ICTA on share loss relief claims
- Appellant’s other arguments considered
- Summary
- Conclusion
- SECOND SHARE LOSS RELIEF ISSUE
- The Law
- An officer of the Board may enquire into— a claim made by any person, or
- Cotter
- Derry CA
- Derry SC
- HMRC’s case in outline
- The present case should have been distinguished on its facts from Derry CA The Appellant’s case in outline
- Discussion and Analysis
- Derry CA not binding: the ordinary rules of precedent
- Distinguishing Derry CA
- Remaking
- THE CLOSURE NOTICE ISSUE
- The Law
- state that in the officer's opinion no amendment of the claim is required, or
- A closure notice takes effect when it is issued…”
- Case law
- Outline of the Appellant’s case
- Discussion and Analysis
- Conclusions