UT (Tax & Chancery) UT-2024-000113 - [2025] UKUT 00165 (TCC)
Fecha: 08-Abr-2025
THE FTT DECISION
THE FTT DECISION
In deciding the appeal, the FTT determined three issues that arose into the validity of HMRC’s enquiries into the share loss relief claim, namely whether:
the Appellant was entitled to make a claim for share loss relief under s.574 of the Income and Corporation Tax Act 1988 (“ICTA”) for losses incurred in the 06-07 tax year carried back and included on his tax return for 05-06. The FTT decided in favour of HMRC that the Appellant was not entitled to carry back the claim in the 05-06 return and it was to be treated as relating to 06-07 by virtue of paragraph 2(3), Schedule 1B TMA.
even if the Appellant was not so entitled, the Appellant had made such a claim “in” (as opposed to “on”) his tax return for 05-06 such that HMRC could only enquire into it under s.9A TMA. The FTT decided in favour of the Appellant that the claim for share loss relief had been made in the return so that HMRC were required to have opened any enquiry under s.9A TMA and the enquiry they did open, under Schedule 1A TMA, was invalid.
even if the Appellant had made the claim in his 05-06 tax return, the Appellant’s claim was required to be included in his 06-07 tax return. The FTT found that this was required such that HMRC were entitled to enquire into the 06-07 return under s.9A TMA 1970 and the enquiry notice for 06-07 was valid.
As a result of finding the Schedule 1A TMA enquiry to be invalid, the only closure notice issue that arose before the FTT was whether HMRC had validly closed the s. 9A TMA enquiry into the Appellant’s 06-07 return. The FTT found in favour of HMRC that the s.9A enquiry was validly closed by a s.28A TMA closure notice because, despite a number of incorrect figures included within it, the reasonable recipient of the notice would understand that the share loss relief claim in respect of 06-07 had been denied in full.
The FTT therefore dismissed the Appellant’s appeal on the basis of the valid enquiry and closure notices under ss.9A and 28A TMA respectively in relation to the tax return for 06-07 which denied all relief.
- Heading
- INTRODUCTION
- THE FTT DECISION
- THE GROUNDS OF APPEAL TO THE UPPER TRIBUNAL
- THE HEARING
- FACTUAL BACKGROUND
- FIRST SHARE LOSS RELIEF ISSUE The FTT identified the first issue in the following terms at [48(1)]
- The Law
- Schedule 1A to this Act shall apply as respects any claim or election which—
- Section 42(2) of this Act shall not apply in relation to the claim The claim shall relate to the later year
- the claim does not have to be made in the return (paragraph 2(2))
- for both tax years
- Otherwise the claim must specify either the year of the loss or the previous tax year
- This subsection explains how the deductions are to be made
- If an individual—
- Case law
- Section 42(2) of this Act shall not apply in relation to the claim The claim shall relate to the later year
- Derry SC
- There were two issues before the Court
- Outline of the Appellant’s case
- Discussion and Analysis
- Prior to the ITA all loss relief claims under ICTA were to be made or treated in a similar way – Schedule 1B TMA applied There is no doubt that Schedule 1B TMA applied to trade loss relief claims made under s.380 ICTA
- The ITA made a limited but material change in the law from ICTA on share loss relief claims
- Appellant’s other arguments considered
- Summary
- Conclusion
- SECOND SHARE LOSS RELIEF ISSUE
- The Law
- An officer of the Board may enquire into— a claim made by any person, or
- Cotter
- Derry CA
- Derry SC
- HMRC’s case in outline
- The present case should have been distinguished on its facts from Derry CA The Appellant’s case in outline
- Discussion and Analysis
- Derry CA not binding: the ordinary rules of precedent
- Distinguishing Derry CA
- Remaking
- THE CLOSURE NOTICE ISSUE
- The Law
- state that in the officer's opinion no amendment of the claim is required, or
- A closure notice takes effect when it is issued…”
- Case law
- Outline of the Appellant’s case
- Discussion and Analysis
- Conclusions