UT (Tax & Chancery) UT-2024-000113 - [2025] UKUT 00165 (TCC)
Fecha: 08-Abr-2025
INTRODUCTION
INTRODUCTION
The Appellant appeals the decision of the First-tier Tribunal (“FTT”) dated 13 June 2024 dismissing his appeal: [2024] UKFTT 00537 (TC) (“the Decision”). The appeal concerns the procedural requirements for HMRC to issue valid enquiry notices and closure notices in respect of share loss relief claimed by the Appellant to have been incurred in the year 2006-07 (“06-07”) but carried back and included on his self-assessment tax return for 2005-06 (“05-06”).
HMRC opened enquiries into: i) the Appellant’s claim included on his return for 05-06 as a standalone claim pursuant to Schedule 1A to the Taxes Management Act 1970 (“TMA”), and; ii) his tax return for 06-07 under s.9A TMA. Thereafter they issued closure notices in respect of each enquiry denying the relief claimed. It was common ground that if the Appellant was entitled to, and did, make his claim for share loss relief ‘in’ the 05-06 tax return, then neither of those enquiries could have extended to that claim because HMRC did not open an enquiry under s.9A into the Appellant’s 05-06 return. In those circumstances HMRC would not have lawfully denied the claim.
- Heading
- INTRODUCTION
- THE FTT DECISION
- THE GROUNDS OF APPEAL TO THE UPPER TRIBUNAL
- THE HEARING
- FACTUAL BACKGROUND
- FIRST SHARE LOSS RELIEF ISSUE The FTT identified the first issue in the following terms at [48(1)]
- The Law
- Schedule 1A to this Act shall apply as respects any claim or election which—
- Section 42(2) of this Act shall not apply in relation to the claim The claim shall relate to the later year
- the claim does not have to be made in the return (paragraph 2(2))
- for both tax years
- Otherwise the claim must specify either the year of the loss or the previous tax year
- This subsection explains how the deductions are to be made
- If an individual—
- Case law
- Section 42(2) of this Act shall not apply in relation to the claim The claim shall relate to the later year
- Derry SC
- There were two issues before the Court
- Outline of the Appellant’s case
- Discussion and Analysis
- Prior to the ITA all loss relief claims under ICTA were to be made or treated in a similar way – Schedule 1B TMA applied There is no doubt that Schedule 1B TMA applied to trade loss relief claims made under s.380 ICTA
- The ITA made a limited but material change in the law from ICTA on share loss relief claims
- Appellant’s other arguments considered
- Summary
- Conclusion
- SECOND SHARE LOSS RELIEF ISSUE
- The Law
- An officer of the Board may enquire into— a claim made by any person, or
- Cotter
- Derry CA
- Derry SC
- HMRC’s case in outline
- The present case should have been distinguished on its facts from Derry CA The Appellant’s case in outline
- Discussion and Analysis
- Derry CA not binding: the ordinary rules of precedent
- Distinguishing Derry CA
- Remaking
- THE CLOSURE NOTICE ISSUE
- The Law
- state that in the officer's opinion no amendment of the claim is required, or
- A closure notice takes effect when it is issued…”
- Case law
- Outline of the Appellant’s case
- Discussion and Analysis
- Conclusions