Asunto C‑542/08

Fecha: 30-Sep-2003

[Petición de decisión prejudicial planteada por el Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Austria)] «Libre circulación de personas — Trabajadores — Igualdad de trato — Complemento especial de antigüedad para profesores de universidad previsto en una normativa nacional cuya incompatibilidad con el Derecho comunitario ha sido declarada mediante sentencia del Tribun...

(Case C-250/19 Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (Belgium) lodged on 25March 2019— B.O.L.v État belge

Fecha: 04-Sep-2003

Language of the case: French Referring court Conseil d’État Parties to the main proceedings Applicant: B.O.L. Defendant: État belge Questions referred In order to guarantee the effectiveness of EU law and not make it impossible to enjoy the right to family reunification which, according to the applicant, is conferred on her by Article4 of Council D...

Case C-438/04

Fecha: 05-Sep-2003

(Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel, Brussels (Belgium)) (Telecommunications – Mobile telephony – Number portability – Per-line or per-number set-up costs for the provision of number portability – Article30 of Directive 2002/22/EC (Universal Service Directive) – Concept of ‘pricing for interconnection related to the provision...

Case C-542/08

Fecha: 30-Sep-2003

(Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Austria)) (Freedom of movement for persons – Workers – Equal treatment – Special length-of-service increment for university professors provided for by national legislation held to be incompatible with Community law by a judgment of the Court – Limitation period − Principles of equ...

Case C‑3/16

Fecha: 30-Sep-2003

(Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Brussel) (Reference for a preliminary ruling— EU law— Rights conferred on individuals— Infringement by a court— Questions referred for a preliminary ruling— Reference to the Court— National court of last instance) Summary— Judgment of the Court (First Chamber), 15March 2017 1.Questions re...

Case C‑34/08

Fecha: 01-Sep-2003

(Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Padova (Italy)) (Milk and milk products – Additional levy on milk – Regulation No 1788/2003 – Validity – Article 33(1) EC – Objectives of the common agricultural policy – Second subparagraph of Article 34(2) EC – Principle of equality – Third paragraph of Article 5 EC – Principle o...

In Case T‑345/03

Fecha: 01-Sep-2003

17As provided in Article 92(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court, if there is a dispute concerning the costs to be recovered, the General Court hearing the case, on application by the party concerned and after hearing the opposite party, is to make an order, from which no appeal lies. 18Under Article91(b) of the Rules of Procedure, ‘ex...

Joined Cases C‑133/19, C‑136/19 and C‑137/19

Fecha: 02-Sep-2003

14.Article4(1)(c) of Directive 2003/86 was transposed into Belgian law by point4 of the first subparagraph of Article10(1) of the loi du 15 décembre 1980 sur l’accès du territoire; le séjour, l’établissement et l’éloignement des étrangers(3) (the Law of 15December 1980 on entry to the territory, residence, establishment and removal of foreign nati...