Case C‑572/19

Fecha: 31-Dic-2006

European Road Transport Telematics Implementation Coordination Organisation– Intelligent Transport Systems & Services Europe (Ertico– ITS Europe) is a cooperative company providing a multisectoral platform to both private and public stakeholders in the intelligent transport systems and services sector. Since 31December 2006, Ertico– ITS Europe ...

(Case C‑665/15

Fecha: 07-Dic-2006

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations— Transport— Driving licences— EU driving licence network— Use of and connection to the EU network) 1.Actions for failure to fulfil obligations— Examination of the merits by the Court— Situation to be taken into consideration— Situation on expiry of the period laid down in the reasoned opinion (Art.25...

(Case T-146/03

Fecha: 12-Dic-2006

State aid – Spanish law providing for measures in favour of the agricultural sector following an increase in fuel prices – Formal examination procedure under Article88(2) EC – Decision finding that certain measures did not constitute aid – Action for annulment – Admissibility – Standing to bring proceedings – Duty to state reasons 1.Actions for ann...

(Case T-162/04

Fecha: 14-Dic-2006

The Court: 1. Dismisses the action; 2. Orders the applicant to pay the costs. ...

(Case T-290/05

Fecha: 11-Dic-2006

Access to documents of the Community institutions – Refusal – Application initiating proceedings – Manifest inadmissibility – No need to adjudicate 1.Actions for annulment – Jurisdiction of the Community judicature – Direction issued to an institution – Not permissible (Art. 230 EC) (see para. 20) 2.Procedure – Application initiating proceedings – ...

(Case T-392/05

Fecha: 11-Dic-2006

Action for annulment – Time-limit for bringing proceedings – Objection of inadmissibility 1.Actions for annulment – Time-limits – Starting point (Art. 230, fifth para., EC; Council Regulation No 659/1999, Arts 7 and 26(3)) (see paras 24-27) 2.Community law – Interpretation – Texts in several languages (see para. 30) 3.Procedure – Time-limit for ins...

(Case T‑14/06

Fecha: 14-Dic-2006

Community trade mark – Procedural issues – Plea of inadmissibility – Notification of the decision of the Board of Appeal – Time-limit for bringing an action Community trade mark – Procedural provisions (Commission Regulation No2868/95, Art. 1, Rules 61(2), 62(1) and (3) and 68) (see paras 22, 25-26, 28) Re: ACTION brought against the decision of th...

(Case T‑288/06

Fecha: 13-Dic-2006

Application for interim measures – Application for suspension of operation –State aid – Admissibility 1.Applications for interim measures – Suspension of operation of a measure – Interim measures – Conditions for granting – Prima facie case – Urgency – Cumulative nature – Weighing-up of all the interests at stake (Arts 225(1) EC, 242 EC and 243 EC;...

(Case T‑310/04

Fecha: 15-Dic-2006

Community trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the Community word mark FERRO – Earlier national word mark FERRERO – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 – Similarity of goods Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Relative ground...

(Case T‑392/04

Fecha: 14-Dic-2006

Community trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the Community figurative trade mark MANŪ MANU MANU – Earlier national word mark MANOU – Refusal to register – Scope and correction of the decision of the Board of Appeal – Restriction of the application for registration – Partial withdrawal of the opposition – Legal interest in bringin...

(Case T‑7/05

Fecha: 12-Dic-2006

Arbitration clause – Fourth framework programme of activities in the field of research and technological development and demonstration – Recovery of sums advanced Procedure – Referral to the Court of First Instance under an arbitration clause (Art. 238 EC; Decision of the European Parliament and Council No 1110/94) (see paras 73-92, 94-107) Re: ACT...

Case T‑837/16

Fecha: 01-Dic-2006

In the judgment in Sweden v Commission (T‑837/16), delivered on 7March 2019, the General Court annulled a decision by which the Commission had authorised certain uses of lead sulfochromate yellow (C.I.Pigment Yellow 34) and lead chromate molybdate sulfate red (C.I.Pigment Red 104) under Regulation (EC) No1907/2006.(1) That authorisation had been re...

(Community trade mark – Article 98(1) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94

Fecha: 14-Dic-2006

12Nokia Corp. (‘Nokia’) is the proprietor of the word mark Nokia, which is registered both as a national mark in Sweden and as a Community trade mark for, inter alia, ‘mobile telephones and their accessories’. 13In 2002, Mr Wärdell imported ‘flash stickers’ into Sweden from the Philippines. These are adhesive stickers which are intended to be attac...

«Competencia – Prácticas colusorias – Acuerdos entre empresas – Artículo 85 del Tratado CEE (posteriormente artículo 85 del Tratado CE; actualmente artículo 81CE) – Artículos 10 a 13 del Reglamento (CEE) nº1984/83

Fecha: 14-Dic-2006

9El 4 de mayo de 1995, la Confederación presentó una denuncia ante el Servicio de Defensa de la Competencia, adscrito al Ministerio de Economía y Hacienda, contra determinadas empresas del sector petrolero, entre ellas CEPSA. Según la Confederación, los contratos celebrados a finales del año 1992 entre CEPSA y las empresas titulares de estaciones d...

(Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Agreements between undertakings – Article 85 of the EEC Treaty (subsequently Article 85 of the EC Treaty and now Article 81 EC) – Articles 10 to 13 of Regulation (EEC) No 1984/83

Fecha: 14-Dic-2006

9On 4 May 1995, the Confederation filed a complaint with the Servicio de Defensa de la Competencia (Competition Protection Department), attached to the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Finance, against certain undertakings in the petroleum sector including CEPSA. The Confederation complained that the agreements concluded at the end of 1992 between ...

(Copyright and related rights in the information society – Directive 2001/29

Fecha: 07-Dic-2006

20SGAE is the body responsible for the management of intellectual property rights in Spain. 21SGAE took the view that the use of television sets and the playing of ambient music within the hotel owned by Rafael, during the period from June 2002 to March 2003, involved communication to the public of works belonging to the repertoire which it manages...

En el asunto C‑13/06

Fecha: 07-Dic-2006

16A tenor del artículo 69, apartado 2, del Reglamento de Procedimiento, la parte que pierda el proceso será condenada en costas, si así lo hubiera solicitado la otra parte. Dado que la Comisión ha pedido que se condene en costas a la República Helénica y al haber sido desestimados los motivos formulados por ésta, procede condenarla en costas. En vi...

En el asunto C‑170/05

Fecha: 14-Dic-2006

7En la época en que se produjeron los hechos, Denkavit Internationaal poseía el 50% del capital de Denkavit France y el 99,9% del capital de Agro Finances, la cual poseía a su vez un 50% del capital de Denkavit France. 8En el transcurso de los años 1987 a 1989, Denkavit France y Agro Finances, que se fusionaron posteriormente, abonaron a Denkavit I...

En el asunto C‑240/05

Fecha: 07-Dic-2006

19Eurodental es una sociedad domiciliada en Luxemburgo cuya actividad consiste principalmente en la fabricación y reparación de prótesis dentales para clientes establecidos en Alemania. 20Mediante decisión de 26 de marzo de 1997, la autoridad fiscal competente denegó a Eurodental, para los ejercicios 1992 y 1993, la deducción del IVA soportado que ...

En el asunto C‑374/04

Fecha: 12-Dic-2006

22El litigio principal se inscribe en la categoría de «group litigation [demanda colectiva]» sobre el ACT, constituida por unas reclamaciones de restitución y/o compensación interpuestas contra los Commissioners of Inland Revenue ante la High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Chancery Division, a raíz de la sentencia Metallgesellschaft y otro...