Acquisition of the Businesses
Acquisition of the Businesses
Over a three–year period from 2004 to 2007, CPW acquired the business and assets of four businesses (the “Businesses”) owned by the following four companies (the “Vendor Companies”):
E2Save.com Limited;
Carphone Warehouse Services Limited (“CWSL”);
Carphone Warehouse UK Limited (“CPWUK”); and
One Stop Phone Shop Limited.
The acquisitions were effected by sale and purchase agreements entered into between CPW and each of the Vendor Companies on 25 March 2004, 2 May 2004, 26 November 2004, and 18 June 2007 respectively (the “Prior SPAs”). Each acquisition included the goodwill of the Businesses.
At the time of the above acquisitions by CPW:
the Vendor Companies and CPW were members of the CPW Group (and the Vendor Companies, like CPW, were members of the CPW Chargeable Gains Group);
the combined value of the acquired goodwill of the Businesses (the “Goodwill”) was £107,658,000; and
as a result of Section 171(1) of the TCGA 1992, the transfer of the Goodwill did not give rise to a charge to tax.
- Heading
- Introduction
- Key parties
- Acquisition of the Businesses
- The SPA and the MSA
- The Degrouping
- Procedural background
- the agreed issues
- the agreements
- The SPA
- The MSA
- The Side Letter
- Initial observations on the Agreements and the Side Letter
- other documents
- The Prior SPAs
- The Property Services Agreement
- The Brand Licence
- The Accounts
- The Invoice
- “ About the matter we have finished checking
- “Partial closure notice (PCN)
- The issues – a summary
- Issue One – applicability of the authorities in relation to statutory construction
- Conclusion
- “15 In the task of ascertaining whether a particular statutory provision imposes a charge, or grants an exemption from a charge, the Ramsay approach is generally described – as it is in the statements
- Issue Two – the scope of the rule prohibiting assignment “in gross”
- Conclusion
- Issue Three – ownership of the Businesses following the execution of the Agreements
- Conclusion
- No provision in the Agreements for the transfer of the Businesses
- No provision in the Agreements for the transfer of assets other than Goodwill or the assumption of any liabilities
- No transfer of employees
- Did BBUK carry on the Businesses after the Agreements became effective?
- This meant that the only way that BBUK could carry on the Businesses was through CPW as its agent. In that regard, I do not doubt the fact that it is possible for a company to carry on a business thro
- Entitlement to the profits of the Businesses
- Conclusion in relation to the ability to dictate the overall strategy and direction of the Businesses and entitlement to the profits of the Businesses
- Final observations
- Conclusion
- Issue Four – assignment in equity
- Conclusion
- Issue Five – not the same asset
- Conclusion
- Issue Six – the relevance of the transaction effected by Agreements in the event that Section 179(3) applied
- Conclusion
- Issue Seven – the tax consequences of the transaction effected by Agreements in the event that Section 179(3) applied
- Conclusions
![TC09562 - [2025] UKFTT 00762 (TC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_7HSuEAV.png)