(Agriculture - EAGGF - Cancellation and request for repayment of financial assistance - Regulation (EEC) No 4253/88 JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Third Chamber)
Fecha: 12-Feb-2004
Tipo de documentos
Año
Fecha: 12-Feb-2004
Fecha: 05-Feb-2004
Fecha: 12-Feb-2004
Fecha: 10-Feb-2004
Fecha: 17-Feb-2004
(Petición de decisión prejudicial planteada por el Landgericht Düsseldorf) «Obtenciones vegetales – Régimen de protección – Artículo 14, apartado 3, del Reglamento (CE) nº 2100/94 y artículo 9 del Reglamento (CE) nº 1768/95 – Utilización por el agricultor en sus tierras, con fines de propagación, del producto de la cosecha de una variedad protegida...
Fecha: 12-Feb-2004
Fecha: 15-Feb-2004
Fecha: 19-Feb-2004
Fecha: 12-Feb-2004
Fecha: 19-Feb-2004
Fecha: 19-Feb-2004
Fecha: 05-Feb-2004
Language of the case: Polish Referring court Sąd Rejonowy w Gliwicach Parties to the main proceedings Applicant: D.Spółka Akcyjna Defendant: W.Zrt Questions referred Must Article5(3) of Regulation (EC) No261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers i...
Fecha: 01-Feb-2004
Language of the case: German Referring court Landgericht Köln Parties to the main proceedings Applicant: Deutsche Lufthansa AG Defendants: GD, WT Question referred Does a strike by the air carrier’s own employees which is called by a trade union constitute an extraordinary circumstance within the meaning of Article5(3) of Regulation (EC) No261/2004...
Fecha: 01-Feb-2004
Language of the case: German Referring court Landgericht Düsseldorf Parties to the main proceedings Applicants: AD, BE, CF Defendant: Corendon Airlines Questions referred Is there a cancellation of a flight within the meaning of Article2(l) and Article5(1) of Regulation (EC) No261/20041 where the operating air carrier brings forward a flight, which...
Fecha: 01-Feb-2004
Language of the case: Dutch Referring court Rechtbank Noord-Nederland Parties to the main proceedings Applicants: HQ, on her own behalf and as the legal representative of her minor child IP, JO Defendant: Aegean Airlines SA Questions referred 1.Must Article8(2) of Regulation No261/20041 be interpreted as meaning that a passenger who, under Directiv...
Fecha: 19-Feb-2004
2.In November 2000, following receipt of a complaint, the Commission sent the French Government a formal letter setting out four ways in which it believed that certain French rules might hinder imports of gold articles into France. 3.In September 2001, it sent the French authorities a reasoned opinion, within the meaning of the first paragraph of A...
Fecha: 01-Feb-2004
Language of the case: German Referring court Landgericht Köln Parties to the main proceedings Applicant and appellant: EF Defendant and respondent: Deutsche Lufthansa AG Questions referred Is a corporate fare which is more favourable than the standard fare (in casu, EUR152.00 instead of EUR169.00), and which is based on a framework agreement betwee...
Fecha: 01-Feb-2004
Language of the case: Italian Referring court Tribunale ordinario di Roma Parties to the main proceedings Applicants: Adriano Guaitoli, Concepción Casan Rodriguez, Alessandro Celano Tomassoni, Antonia Cirilli, Lucia Cortini, Mario Giuli, Patrizia Padroni Defendant: easyJet Airline Co. Ltd Questions referred If a party whose flight has been delayed ...
Fecha: 12-Feb-2004
Fecha: 17-Feb-2004