HT-2025-000036 - [2025] EWHC 2707 (TCC)
Technology and Construction Court

HT-2025-000036 - [2025] EWHC 2707 (TCC)

Fecha: 21-Oct-2025

The Subcontract fails to adequately identify a relevant “Interim Valuation Date” for Payment Cycle #23, meaning that clause 4 must be substantially re-written by Part II of the Scheme. The necessary m

(1)

The Subcontract fails to adequately identify a relevant “Interim Valuation Date” for Payment Cycle #23, meaning that clause 4 must be substantially re-written by Part II of the Scheme. The necessary modifications to clause 4 mean there was no right in Gypcraft to submit Interim Payment Application #23 before that (new, statutorily imposed) due date. This argument is not pleaded, but it requires no disputed evidence. It is purely a matter of submission to be argued on the construction of the documents.