(Case T-553/19 Action brought on 8August 2019 – Perfect Bar v EUIPO (PERFECT BAR)

Fecha: 08-Ago-2019

Language of the case: English Parties Applicant: Perfect Bar LLC (San Diego, California, United States) (represented by: F.Miazzetto, J.Gracia Albero, R.Seoane Lacayo and E.Cebollero González, lawyers) Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) Details of the proceedings before EUIPO Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applica...

(Case T-554/19 Action brought on 9August 2019— Spain v Commission

Fecha: 09-Ago-2019

Language of the case: Spanish Parties Applicant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: M.García-Valdecasas Dorrego, acting as Agent) Defendant: European Commission Form of order sought The applicant claims that the Court should: annul the competition notice; and order the European Commission to pay the costs. Pleas in law and main arguments The present...

(Case T-555/19 Action brought on 9August 2019– Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi v EUIPO – Fontana Food (GRILLOUMI)

Fecha: 09-Ago-2019

Language of the case: English Parties Applicant: Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi (Nicosia, Cyprus) (represented by: S.Malynicz QC, S.Baran, Barrister and V.Marsland, Solicitor) Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Fo...

(Case T-557/19 Action brought on 9 August 2019– Seven v EUIPO (7Seven)

Fecha: 09-Ago-2019

Language of the case: English Parties Applicant: Seven SpA (Leinì, Italy) (represented by: L.Trevisan, lawyer) Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) Details of the proceedings before EUIPO Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark 7Seven – European Union trade mark No 8 252 223 Contested decision: Decision of the ...

(Case T-558/19 Action brought on 13August 2019— Luz Saúde v EUIPO— Clínica La Luz (HOSPITAL DA LUZ LEARNING HEALTH TRAINING, RESEARCH & INNOVATION CENTER)

Fecha: 13-Ago-2019

Language in which the application was lodged: Portuguese Parties Applicant: Luz Saúde, SA (Lisbon, Portugal) (represented by: G.Moreira Rato, lawyer) Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Clínica La Luz, SL (Madrid, Spain) Details of the proceedings before EUIPO App...

(Case T-559/19 Action brought on 12 August 2019– Julius Sämann v EUIPO – Maharishi Vedic University (Representation of a tree)

Fecha: 12-Ago-2019

Language of the case: English Parties Applicant: Julius Sämann Ltd (Thayngen, Switzerland) (represented by: D.Parrish, Solicitor) Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Maharishi Vedic University Ltd (Mgarr, Malta) Details of the proceedings before EUIPO Applicant of...

(Case T-561/19 Action brought on 13August 2019– Lípidos Santiga v Commission

Fecha: 13-Ago-2019

Language of the case: English Parties Applicant: Lípidos Santiga, SA (Santa Perpètua de Mogoda, Spain) (represented by: P.Muñiz Fernández, lawyer) Defendant: European Commission Form of order sought The applicant claims that the Court should: annul Article3 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/807 of 13March 2019, supplementing Directive (E...

(Case T-562/19 Action brought on 14August 2019— Klein v Commission

Fecha: 14-Ago-2019

Language of the case: German Parties Applicant: Christoph Klein (Großgmain, Austria) (represented by: H.-J.Ahlt, lawyer) Defendant: European Commission Form of order sought The applicant claims that the Court should: declare that, by taking no action and failing to adopt a decision, pursuant to Article8(2) of Directive 93/42/EEC,1 in the safeguard ...

(Case T-563/19 Action brought on 14August2019– Perfect Bar v EUIPO (PERFECT Bar)

Fecha: 14-Ago-2019

Language of the case: English Parties Applicant: Perfect Bar LLC (San Diego, California, United States) (represented by: F.Miazzetto, J.GraciaAlbero, R.SeoaneLacayo and E.CebolleroGonzález, lawyers) Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) Details of the proceedings before EUIPO Trade mark at issue: Application for European Un...

(Case T-565/19 Action brought on 14 August 2019– Oltchim v Commission

Fecha: 14-Ago-2019

Language of the case: English Parties Applicant: Oltchim SA (Râmnicu Vâlcea, Romania) (represented by: C.Arhold, L.-A.Bondoc and S.Petrisor, lawyers) Defendant: European Commission Form of order sought The applicant claims that the Court should: annul Articles1 and Article3 to 7 of the Commission decision of 17December 2018 in State aid Case SA.360...

(Case T-568/19 Action brought on 16August 2019 – Micreos Food Safety v Commission

Fecha: 16-Ago-2019

Language of the case: English Parties Applicant: Micreos Food Safety BV (Wageningen, Netherlands) (represented by: S.Pappas, lawyer) Defendant: European Commission Form of order sought The applicant claims that the Court should: annul the decisions of the Director General for Health and Food Safety of 17June 2019, forming a unity, by which the Comm...

(Case T-569/19 Action brought on 15August 2019 – AlzChem Group v Commission

Fecha: 15-Ago-2019

Language of the case: English Parties Applicant: AlzChem Group AG (Trostberg, Germany) (represented by: A.Borsos and J.Guerrero Pérez, lawyers) Defendant: European Commission Form of order sought The applicants claim that the Court should: declare the application admissible and well founded ; annul the Decision C(2019)5602 of the Secretary General ...

(Case T-573/19 Action brought on 16August 2019— DS and Others v Commission and EEAS

Fecha: 16-Ago-2019

Language of the case: French Parties Applicants: DS and 718 other applicants (represented by: S.Orlandi and T.Martin, lawyers) Defendants: European Commission and European External Action Service Form of order sought The applicants claim that the Court should: annul the decisions fixing the applicants’ number of days of paid annual leave for 2019; ...

(Case T-574/19 Action brought on 16 August 2019– Tinnus Enterprises v EUIPO – Mystic Products Import & Export and Koopman International (Fluid distribution equipment)

Fecha: 16-Ago-2019

Language of the case: English Parties Applicant: Tinnus Enterprises LLC (Plano, Texas, United States) (represented by: A.Odle, lawyer and J.StVille, Barrister) Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Mystic Products Import & Export, SL (Badalona, Spain), Koopman...