Tipo de documentos
Año
Fecha: 16-Dic-2021
77.As regards the use of railway infrastructure, I have already recalled that the charge for minimum access and for access to infrastructure connecting service facilities ‘shall be set at the cost that is directly incurred as a result of operating the train service’. 78.The items listed in AnnexI must be taken into account in the calculation of th...
Fecha: 16-Dic-2021
13.Regulation No1925/2006 harmonises the provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States which relate to the addition of vitamins and minerals and of certain other substances to foods, with the purpose of ensuring the effective functioning of the internal market, whilst providing a high level of consumer protectio...
Fecha: 16-Dic-2021
85.In the first part of the first ground of the appeal, the Commission claims that the General Court (in paragraphs48 to 64 of the judgment under appeal) erred in law in its interpretation of Article91(1) of the Staff Regulations, and that such interpretation runs contrary to the position of the Court of Justice as adopted in the review judgment. ...
Fecha: 16-Dic-2021
23.I think it is necessary, as a preliminary step, to make a number of observations concerning the relatively complex legal regime for refusal of enforcement established by Regulation No1215/2012. 24.First, it has been observed in the literature that, in the context of Regulation No1215/2012, it is for the sentenced person to respond in order to s...
Fecha: 09-Dic-2021
4.Article50 provides: ‘No one shall be liable to be tried or punished again in criminal proceedings for an offence for which he or she has already been finally acquitted or convicted within the Union in accordance with the law.’ 5.Article51 stipulates: ‘1.The provisions of this Charter are addressed to the institutions, bodies, offices and agencie...
Fecha: 02-Dic-2021
27.The appeal in cassation criticises the appeal court for not having determined of its own motion whether it had jurisdiction under Article10 of Regulation No650/2012, when it should (allegedly) have done so. 28.The analysis of that ground of the appeal in cassation falls logically to the referring court, which is in the best position to examine ...
Fecha: 16-Dic-2021
12.The Commission outlined the transfer pricing guidelines of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and indicated that transfer prices referred to prices charged for commercial transactions between various entities belonging to the same corporate group. It stated that, in order to avoid a situation where multinational co...
Fecha: 16-Dic-2021
10.The Commission described the tax ruling at issue as endorsing a method for arriving at a profit allocation to FFT within the Fiat/Chrysler automobile group, which enabled FFT to determine its corporate income tax liability to the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg on a yearly basis. The Commission stated that that ruling was binding on the tax administr...
Fecha: 08-Dic-2021
Language of the case: English Parties Applicant: BZ (represented by: H.Tettenborn, lawyer) Defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: E.Carlini and F.Feyerbacher, acting as Agents, and by B.Wägenbaur, lawyer) Re: Application under Article270 TFEU and Article50a of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union for, first, annulmen...
Fecha: 15-Dic-2021
Language of the case: Dutch Parties Applicant: Stichting Comité N 65 Ondergronds Helvoirt (Helvoirt, Netherlands) (represented by: T.Malfait and A.Croes, lawyers) Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L.Haasbeek, G.Gattinara and M.Noll-Ehlers, acting as Agents) Interveners in support of the defendant: Kingdom of the Netherlands (represent...
Fecha: 15-Dic-2021
Language of the case: English Parties Applicant: HB (represented by: C.Bernard-Glanz, lawyer) Defendant: European Investment Bank (represented by: G.Faedo and K.Carr, acting as Agents, and by B.Wägenbaur, lawyer) Re: Action under Article270 TFEU and Article50a of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union seeking annulment of the dec...
Fecha: 01-Dic-2021
Language of the case: English Parties Applicant: Illumina, Inc. (Wilmington, Delaware, United States) (represented by: D.Beard, Barrister-at-law, and P.Chappatte, lawyer) Defendant: European Commission Form of order sought The applicant claims that the Court should: annul the Commission’s decision of 29 October 2021 in case COMP/M.10493 taken pursu...
Fecha: 02-Dic-2021
Language of the case: English Parties Applicant: Activa - Grillküche GmbH (Selb, Germany) (represented by: F.Stangl and M.Würth, lawyers) Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Targa GmbH (Soest, Germany) Details of the proceedings before EUIPO Proprietor of the desi...
Fecha: 01-Dic-2021
Language in which the application was lodged: Hungarian Parties Applicant: Dorsum Informatikai Fejlesztő és Szolgáltató Zrt. (Budapest, Hungary) (represented by: Gy. Hajdu, lawyer) Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: ID Quantique SA (Carouge, Switzerland) Details ...
Fecha: 06-Dic-2021
Language of the case: English Parties Applicant: Société des produits Nestlé SA (Vevey, Switzerland) (represented by: A.Jaeger-Lenz and J.Thomsen, lawyers) Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: The a2 Milk Company Ltd (Auckland, New Zealand) Details of the proceedin...
Fecha: 06-Dic-2021
Language of the case: French Parties Applicants: Fabien Courtois (Rueil-Malmaison, France) and 2088 other applicants (represented by: A.Durand, lawyer) Defendant: European Commission Form of order sought The applicants claim that the Court should: declare the applicants’ claims admissible and well founded; annul the implied decision of rejection of...
Fecha: 08-Dic-2021
Language of the case: English Parties Applicant: C&C IP UK Ltd (Bristol, United Kingdom) (represented by: A.von Mühlendahl and H.Hartwig, lawyers) Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Tipico Group ltd. (St.Julian’s, Malta) Details of the proceedings before EUIP...
Fecha: 07-Dic-2021
Language of the case: English Parties Applicant: SE (represented by: L.Levi and A.Blot, lawyers) Defendant: European Commission Form of order sought The applicant claims that the Court should: annul the decision dated 23 April 2021 to reject the applicant’s candidacy to the Junior Professional Pilot program (hereinafter “JPP program”); annul, insof...
Fecha: 07-Dic-2021
Language of the case: Spanish Parties Applicant: Fundación Imdea Materiales (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: P.Suárez Fernández, J.Salinas Casado and Z.Marcos Vaquero, lawyers) Defendant: European Commission Form of order sought The applicant submits that the Court should: declare that the European Commission has failed to comply with Article II.22...
Fecha: 09-Dic-2021
Language of the case: English Parties Applicant: Daw SE (Ober-Ramstadt, Germany) (represented by: A.Haberl, lawyer) Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Sapa Building Systems SpA (Naviglio, Italy) Details of the proceedings before EUIPO Applicant of the trade mark ...