(Case C-485/21 Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rayonen sad Nesebar (Bulgaria) lodged on 5August 2021– S.V.OOD v E.Ts. D.

Fecha: 05-Ago-2021

Language of the case: Bulgarian Referring court Rayonen sad Nesebar Parties to the main proceedings Applicant: S.V.OOD Defendant: E.Ts. D. Questions referred Are natural persons who own individual units in a co-owned building ‘consumers’ (within the meaning of Article2(b) of Council Directive 93/13/EEC1 of 5April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer co...

(Case C-486/21 Request for a preliminary ruling from the Državna revizijska komisija za revizijo postopkov oddaje javnih naročil (Slovenia) lodged on 9August 2021– SHARENGO najem in zakup vozil d.o.o. v Mestna občina Ljubljana

Fecha: 09-Ago-2021

Language of the case: Slovenian Referring court Državna revizijska komisija za revizijo postopkov oddaje javnih naročil Parties to the main proceedings Applicant: SHARENGO najem in zakup vozil d.o.o. Defendant: Mestna občina Ljubljana Questions referred Is Regulation (EC) No2195/2002 [of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5November 2002 ...

(Case C-487/21 Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Austria) lodged on 9August 2021– F.F.

Fecha: 09-Ago-2021

Language of the case: German Referring court Bundesverwaltungsgericht Parties to the main proceedings Applicant: F.F. Other parties: Österreichische Datenschutzbehörde, CRIF GmbH Questions referred Is the term ‘copy’ in Article15(3) of Regulation (EU) 2016/6791 (‘the GDPR’) to be interpreted as meaning a photocopy, a facsimile or an electronic copy...

(Case C-489/21 Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 6August 2021– Banka DSK EAD v M.V.

Fecha: 06-Ago-2021

Language of the case: Bulgarian Referring court Sofiyski rayonen sad Parties to the main proceedings Applicant: Banka DSK EAD Defendant: M.V. Questions referred Is Article3(1) of Directive 93/13/EEC,1 read in conjunction with subparagraphs (e) and (f) of paragraph1 of the annex to that directive, to be interpreted as meaning that terms are contrary...

(Case C-491/21 Request for a preliminary ruling from the Înalta Curte de Casație și Justiție (Romania) lodged on 10August 2021– WA v Direcția pentru Evidența Persoanelor și Administrarea Bazelor de Date din Ministerul Afacerilor Interne

Fecha: 10-Ago-2021

Language of the case: Romanian Referring court Înalta Curte de Casație și Justiție Parties to the main proceedings Appellant: WA Respondent: Direcția pentru Evidența Persoanelor și Administrarea Bazelor de Date din Ministerul Afacerilor Interne Question referred Must Article26(2) TFEU, Articles20, 21(1) and 45(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Right...

(Case C-493/21 Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal (Ireland) made on 11August 2021 – K.M. v The Director of Public Prosecutions

Fecha: 11-Ago-2021

Language of the case: English Referring court Court of Appeal Parties to the main proceedings Applicant: K.M. Defendant: The Director of Public Prosecutions Questions referred Do the terms of Article 89 and/or 90 of the Regulation1 , and the requirements of proportionality under the Charter and EU law, require the sentencing court to have a discret...

(Case C-494/21 Reference for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland) made on 11August 2021 – Eircom Limited v Commission for Communications Regulation

Fecha: 11-Ago-2021

Language of the case: English Referring court High Court (Ireland) Parties to the main proceedings Applicant: Eircom Limited Defendant: Commission for Communications Regulation Notice parties: Vodafone Ireland Limited, Three Ireland (Hutchinson) Limited, Three Ireland Services (Hutchinson) Limited Questions referred In circumstances where: the tele...

(Case C-495/21 Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 12August 2021– L.GmbH v Federal Republic of Germany

Fecha: 12-Ago-2021

Language of the case: German Referring court Bundesverwaltungsgericht Parties to the main proceedings Appellant on a point of law: L.GmbH Respondent in the appeal on a point of law: Federal Republic of Germany Questions referred Can the principal intended action of a substance be pharmacological within the meaning of Article1(2)(a) of Directive 93/...

(Case C-496/21 Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 12August 2021– H.Ltd. v Federal Republic of Germany

Fecha: 12-Ago-2021

Language of the case: German Referring court Bundesverwaltungsgericht Parties to the main proceedings Appellant on a point of law: H.Ltd. Respondent in the appeal on a point of law: Federal Republic of Germany Questions referred Can the principal intended action of a substance be pharmacological within the meaning of Article1(2)(a) of Directive 93/...

(Case C-497/21 Request for a preliminary ruling from the Schleswig-Holsteinisches Verwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 13August 2021– SI and Others v Federal Republic of Germany

Fecha: 13-Ago-2021

Language of the case: German Referring court Schleswig-Holsteinisches Verwaltungsgericht Parties to the main proceedings Applicants: SI, TL, ND, VH, YT, HN Defendant: Federal Republic of Germany Questions referred Is national legislation under which an application for international protection can be rejected as an inadmissible subsequent applicatio...

(Case C-504/21 Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Stade (Germany) lodged on 17August 2021– Applicant 1 and Others v Bundesrepublik Deutschland

Fecha: 17-Ago-2021

Language of the case: German Referring court Verwaltungsgericht Stade Parties to the main proceedings Applicants: Applicant 1, Applicant 2, Applicant 3, Applicant 4, Applicant 5 Party opposing the applications: Bundesrepublik Deutschland (represented by the Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge) Questions referred Justiciability Is Article27 of R...

(Case C-505/21 Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du travail de Liège (Belgium) lodged on 18August 2021– FU v Agence fédérale pour l’Accueil des demandeurs d’asile (Fedasil)

Fecha: 18-Ago-2021

Language of the case: French Referring court Tribunal du travail de Liège Parties to the main proceedings Applicant: FU Defendant: Agence fédérale pour l’Accueil des demandeurs d’asile (Fedasil) Questions referred Is Article27(3) of the Dublin III Regulation (Regulation No604/2013),1 where appropriate read in the light of Article47 of the Charter o...

(Case C-506/21 Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Erfurt (Germany) lodged on 18August 2021– UM v Daimler AG

Fecha: 18-Ago-2021

Language of the case: German Referring court Landgericht Erfurt Parties to the main proceedings Applicant: UM Defendant: Daimler AG Questions referred Are Articles18(1), 26(1) and 46 of Directive 2007/46/EC,1 read in conjunction with Articles4, 5 and 13 of Regulation (EC) No715/2007,2 also intended to protect the interests of individual purchasers ...

(Case C-510/21 Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 19August 2021– DB v Austrian Airlines AG

Fecha: 19-Ago-2021

Language of the case: German Referring court Oberster Gerichtshof Parties to the main proceedings Applicant: DB Defendant: Austrian Airlines AG Questions referred Is first aid which is administered on board an aircraft following an accident within the meaning of Article17(1) of the Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules for International C...

(Case C-512/21 Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék (Hungary) lodged on 17August 2021– Aquila Part Prod Com S.A. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága

Fecha: 17-Ago-2021

Language of the case: Hungarian Referring court Fővárosi Törvényszék Parties to the main proceedings Applicant: Aquila Part Prod Com S.A. Defendant: Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága Questions referred Is a practice of a tax authority pursuant to which that authority, automatically and without carrying out any checks, concludes ...

(Case C-517/21 Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Korneuburg (Austria) lodged on 20August 2021– Laudamotion GmbH v TG, QN, AirHelp Germany GmbH

Fecha: 20-Ago-2021

Language of the case: German Referring court Landesgericht Korneuburg Parties to the main proceedings Applicant: Laudamotion GmbH Defendants: TG, QN, AirHelp Germany GmbH Questions referred Is Article3(2)(a) of Regulation (EC) No261/20041 to be interpreted as meaning that the regulation applies to a passenger who checks in online but does not prese...

(Case C-519/21 Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Cluj (Romania) lodged on 24August 2021– ASA v DGRFP Cluj

Fecha: 24-Ago-2021

Language of the case: Romanian Referring court Curtea de Apel Cluj Parties to the main proceedings Appellant: ASA Respondent: DGRFP Cluj Parties joined as guarantors: BP, MB Questions referred Can VAT Directive 2006/[1]121 in general, and Articles9, 12, 14, 62, 63, 65, 73 and 78 in particular, be interpreted, in a specific context such as that of t...

(Case C-521/21 Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy Poznań-Stare Miasto w Poznaniu (Poland) lodged on 23August 2021– MJ v AA

Fecha: 23-Ago-2021

Language of the case: Polish Referring court Sąd Rejonowy Poznań-Stare Miasto w Poznaniu Parties to the main proceedings Applicant: MJ Defendant: AA Other party: Rzecznik Praw Obywatelskich Questions referred 1.Must Articles2 and 19(1) of the Treaty on European Union (‘the TEU’) and Article6(1) to (3) TEU, read in conjunction with Article47 of the ...

(Case C-522/21 Request for a preliminary ruling from the Pfälzisches Oberlandesgericht (Germany) lodged on 24August 2021– MS v Saatgut Treuhandverwaltungs GmbH

Fecha: 24-Ago-2021

Language of the case: German Referring court Pfälzisches Oberlandesgericht Parties to the main proceedings Defendant and appellant: MS Applicant and respondent: Saatgut Treuhandverwaltungs GmbH Question referred Is Article18(2) of Commission Regulation (EC) No1768/95 of 24July 1995 implementing rules on the agricultural exemption provided for in Ar...