Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea

Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea

curia.europa.eu

Tipo de documentos

Otros

Año

2020

Mes

Agosto

(Case C-394/20 Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 18August 2020– XY v Finanzamt V

Fecha: 18-Ago-2020

Language of the case: German Referring court Finanzgericht Düsseldorf Parties to the main proceedings Applicant: XY Defendant: Finanzamt V Questions referred Must Articles63(1) and 65 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) be interpreted as precluding national legislation of a Member State on the levying of inheritance tax wh...

(Case C-395/20 Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 19August 2020– EP, GM v Corendon Airlines Turistik Hava Tasimacilik A.S.

Fecha: 19-Ago-2020

Language of the case: German Referring court Landgericht Düsseldorf Parties to the main proceedings Applicants: EP, GM Defendant: Corendon Airlines Turistik Hava Tasimacilik A.S. Questions referred Is a flight cancelled within the meaning of Articles2(l) and 5(1) of Regulation (EC) No261/20041 where the operating air carrier postpones a flight book...

(Case C-398/20 Request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský soud v Brně (Czech Republic) lodged on 20August 2020– ELVOSPOL v Odvolací finanční ředitelství

Fecha: 20-Ago-2020

Language of the case: Czech Referring court Krajský soud v Brně Parties to the main proceedings Applicant: ELVOSPOL Defendant: Odvolací finanční ředitelství Question referred Is national legislation contrary to the purpose of Article90(1) and (2) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC1 of 28November 2006 on the common system of value added tax if it lays...

(Case C-405/20 Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 28August 2020– EB and Others v Versicherungsanstalt öffentlich Bediensteter, Eisenbahnen und Bergbau (BVAEB)

Fecha: 28-Ago-2020

Language of the case: German Referring court Verwaltungsgerichtshof Parties to the main proceedings Applicants: EB, JS and DP Defendant: Versicherungsanstalt öffentlich Bediensteter, Eisenbahnen und Bergbau (BVAEB) Questions referred Must the limitation of the scope ratione temporis of the requirement of equal treatment for men and women laid down ...

(Case C-406/20 Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Köln (Germany) lodged on 28August 2020– Phantasialand v Finanzamt Brühl

Fecha: 28-Ago-2020

Language of the case: German Referring court Finanzgericht Köln Parties to the main proceedings Applicant: Phantasialand Defendant: Finanzamt Brühl Questions referred Can the listing of fairs and amusement parks in AnnexIII(7) to Directive 2006/112,1 in conjunction with Article98(2) thereof, be relied on as the basis for drawing a distinction in th...

(Case C-407/20 Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Wien (Austria) lodged on 31August 2020– Österreichische Apothekerkammer v HA

Fecha: 31-Ago-2020

Language of the case: German Referring court Oberlandesgericht Wien Parties to the main proceedings Applicant: Österreichische Apothekerkammer Defendant: HA Question referred Is Article36 TFEU to be interpreted as meaning that a national prohibition on mail-order sales of in vitro diagnostic medical devices for determining HIV status intended by th...

(Case T-142/21 Action brought on 7 March 2021– WIZZ Air Hungary v Commission

Fecha: 20-Ago-2020

Language of the case: English Parties Applicant: WIZZ Air Hungary Légiközlekedési Zrt. (Budapest, Hungary) (represented by: E.Vahida, S.Rating, and I.Metaxas-Maranghidis, lawyers) Defendant: European Commission Form of order sought The applicant claims that the Court should: annul the defendant’s decision (EU) of 20 August 2020 in State aid Case SA...

(Case T-475/20 Action brought on 9August 2020– LE v Commission

Fecha: 09-Ago-2020

Language of the case: English Parties Applicant: LE (represented by: M.Straus, lawyer) Defendant: European Commission Form of order sought The applicant claims that the Court should: annul the decision of the Commission C(2020) 3988 final, of 9 June 2020, and the decision and debit notes in relation thereto and its execution and implementation by t...

(Case T-484/20 Action brought on 3August 2020– SATSE v Commission

Fecha: 03-Ago-2020

Language of the case: Spanish Parties Applicant: Sindicato de Enfermería (SATSE) (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: M.Sesmero González, lawyer) Defendant: European Commission Form of order sought The applicant claims that the General Court should: Annul Commission Directive (EU) 2020/739 of 3June 2020 amending AnnexIII to Directive 2000/54/EC of the ...

(Case T-485/20 Action brought on 5August 2020– Junqueras i Vies v Parliament

Fecha: 05-Ago-2020

Language of the case: Spanish Parties Applicant: Oriol Junqueras i Vies (Sant Joan de Vilatorrada, Spain) (represented by: A.Van den Eynde Adroer, lawyer) Defendant: European Parliament Form of order sought The applicant claims that the General Court should: Annul the Decision of the European Parliament/ Directorate General for Finance– Directorate...

(Case T-486/20 Action brought on 3August 2020– H&H v EUIPO– Giuliani (Swisse)

Fecha: 03-Ago-2020

Language of the case: English Parties Applicant: Health and Happiness (H&H) Hong Kong Ltd (Hong Kong, China) (represented by: D.Rose, L.Flascher, Solicitors and N.Saunders, QC) Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Giuliani SpA (Milan, Italy) Details of the proc...

(Case T-487/20 Action brought on 4August 2020– Rezon v EUIPO (imot.bg)

Fecha: 04-Ago-2020

Language of the case: Bulgarian Parties Applicant: Rezon OOD (Sofia, Bulgaria) (represented by: M.Yordanova-Harizanova, lawyer) Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) Details of the proceedings before EUIPO Trade mark at issue: Application for the EU figurative mark ‘imot.bg’– Application for registration No18001398 Conteste...

(Case T-490/20 Action brought on 2August 2020– CH and CN v Parliament

Fecha: 02-Ago-2020

Language of the case: French Parties Applicants: CH and CN (represented by: C.Bernard-Glanz, lawyer) Defendant: European Parliament Form of order sought The applicants claim that the Court should: declare their application admissible; annul the contested decisions, in that they do not adopt a final decision on the veracity of the alleged occurrence...