(Appeal– Competition– Agreements, decisions and concerted practices– European market for power cables– Market allocation in connection with projects– Regulation (EC) No1/2003

Fecha: 27-Ene-2021

3The background to the dispute, as set out in paragraphs1 to 22 and 47 of the judgment under appeal, may, for the purposes of the present proceedings, be summarised as follows. 4The appellant, The Goldman Sachs Group, is a company established in the United States. It is an investment bank which operates in all the major financial centres around the...

(Appeal– Economic and monetary union– Banking union– Regulation (EU) No806/2014

Fecha: 06-May-2021

6ABLV Bank, the appellant in Case C‑551/19P, is a credit institution established in Latvia and the parent company of the ABLV group. ABLV Bank Luxembourg is a credit institution established in Luxembourg and is one of the subsidiaries of the ABLV group; ABLV Bank is the sole shareholder of ABLV Bank Luxembourg. 7MrBernis, MrFiļs, OF Holding and Cas...

(Appeal– Energy– Directive (EU) 2018/2001– Promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources– Limit on use of biofuels produced from food and feed crops– Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/807

Fecha: 21-Oct-2021

2Recital81 of Directive (EU) 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11December 2018 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources (OJ 2018 L328, p.82) states: ‘… Indirect land-use change occurs when the cultivation of crops for biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels displaces traditional production of crops for f...

(Appeal– Establishment of a list of substances subject to authorisation– List of substances identified with a view to their eventual inclusion in AnnexXIV to Regulation (EC) No1907/2006

Fecha: 21-Dic-2021

20Bisphenol A (BPA, 2,2-bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)propane or 4,4’-isopropylidenediphenol, EC 201-245-8, CAS0000080-05-7) is an organic compound of the aromatic family, used mainly in the manufacture of plastics and resins. Achieved by reaction between two equivalents of phenol and an acetone equivalent, its molecule comprises two phenol functional groups...

(Appeal– EU trade mark– Absolute grounds for refusal or invalidity of registration– Sign consisting exclusively of the shape of goods which is necessary to obtain a technical result– Regulation (EC) No40/94

Fecha: 03-Jun-2021

5The facts of the dispute, as set out in paragraphs1 to 8 of the judgment under appeal, may be summarised as follows. 6On 23July 2001, Pirelli Tyre SpA (‘Pirelli’) filed an application for registration of a Community trade mark with EUIPO pursuant to Regulation No40/94. Registration as a mark was sought for the following figurative sign: 7The goods...

(Appeal– European Social Fund (ESF)– European Regional Development Fund (ERDF)– Partial cancellation of assistance for operational programmes in the Czech Republic– Directive 2004/18

Fecha: 17-Jun-2021

2Article1(a)(iv) of Council Directive 92/50/EEC of 18June 1992 relating to the coordination of procedures for the award of public service contracts (OJ 1992 L209, p.1), which was repealed by Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, ...

(Appeal– Interim order– Regulation (EC) No1907/2006

Fecha: 16-Jul-2021

17By its appeal, the appellant claims that the Court of Justice should: –set aside the order under appeal and grant suspension of operation of the decision at issue; –order the extension, for the duration of that suspension of operation, of the prescribed period within which it is to submit the results of the studies at issue, in the event that the...

(Appeal– Intervention– Second paragraph of Article40 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union– Interest in the result of the case– Public health– Medicinal products for human use– Regulation (EC) No726/2004– Directive 2001/83

Fecha: 24-Jun-2021

Arguments 12In support of their appeal, Teva and Others claim, in the first place, that they have a direct and specific interest in the result of the case which justifies their intervention in support of the form of order sought by the Commission. Consequently, the General Court erred in law in paragraph30 of the order under appeal by finding that ...

(Appeal– Plant protection products– Active substance– Regulation (EC) No1107/2009– Article6(f)– AnnexII, point2.2– Definition of ‘further confirmatory information’– Implementing Regulation (EU) No844/2012

Fecha: 09-Dic-2021

2Under recital8 of Regulation (EC) No1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21October 2009 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market and repealing Council Directives 79/117/EEC and 91/414/EEC (OJ 2009 L309, p.1): ‘The purpose of this Regulation is to ensure a high level of protection of both human and an...

(Appeal– Regulation (EC) No1107/2009– Articles4 and 21– Criteria for approval– Review of approval– Plant protection products– Implementing Regulation (EU) No485/2013

Fecha: 06-May-2021

45Bayer CropScience submits that the General Court erred in law in concluding, in paragraphs162 and 179 in particular of the judgment under appeal, that an increase in the level of certainty of the previous scientific knowledge could be classified as ‘new knowledge’, thereby authorising the Commission to review the approval concerned under Article...

(Appeal– Regulation (EC) No1907/2006

Fecha: 25-Feb-2021

9The background to the dispute is set out in paragraphs1 to 30 of the judgment under appeal and may, for the purposes of the present proceedings, be summarised as follows. 10Lead sulfochromate yellow and lead chromate molybdate sulfate red are pigments widely used, due to their durability, light colour and brilliance, in varnishes and paints, in pa...

(Appeal– State aid– Aid scheme– Article108(2) and (3) TFEU– Regulation (EC) No659/1999

Fecha: 02-Sep-2021

5Title 3 of the Guidelines on State aid for environmental protection and energy 2014-2020 (OJ 2014 C200, p.1; ‘the 2014-2020 Guidelines’), headed ‘Compatibility assessment under Article107(3)[(c)] [TFEU]’, contains the following wording: ‘(25)Section 3.2 sets out the general compatibility conditions applicable to all aid measures falling within th...

(Appeal– State aid– Aid scheme implemented by the Kingdom of Belgium– Excess profit exemption– Tax ruling– Consistent administrative practice– Regulation (EU) 2015/1589

Fecha: 16-Sep-2021

5The factual background to the dispute was set out by the General Court in paragraphs1 to 28 of the judgment under appeal. For the purposes of the present proceedings, they may be summarised as follows. Belgian law The CIR92 6In Belgium, the rules for the taxation of income are laid down in the Code des impôts sur les revenus 1992 (Income Tax Code ...

(Application for interim relief– Appeal– Articles278 and 279 TFEU– Application for suspension of operation of a measure– Application for interim measures– Regulation (EC) No714/2009

Fecha: 16-Jul-2021

4The facts giving rise to the dispute, as set out in paragraphs1 to 13 of the judgment under appeal, are as follows: 5Aquind Ltd is the project promoter for a proposed electricity interconnector connecting the electricity transmission systems in the United Kingdom and France. 6On 17May 2017, Aquind submitted a request under Article17 of Regulation ...