[2025] UKUT 00185 (TCC)
Upper Tribunal Tax and Chancery Chamber

[2025] UKUT 00185 (TCC)

Fecha: 09-Abr-2025

The RWA Report

The RWA Report

208.

The next topic was RWA reclassification. The RWA Report (Footnote: 4) which had been put before the CRPAC (see §174) had been circulated in advance. Mr Dransfield presented this paper, as he had done to the CRPAC the day before.

209.

The RWA Report thus included the slides which said that RWAs were expected to increase by an estimated £642m including £574m relating to CLIP loans, and that “any further adjustments to calculations are not expected to be material”. Ms Gillan confirmed in cross-examination that both those statements reflected what she thought at the time.

210.

The minutes record the following:

"As reported to the previous meeting, the bank had identified that some commercial assets were receiving the wrong risk weighting, which had been driven by a lack of clarity and conflicting rules in the regulatory publications. The bank is now remediating this issue. The issue had affected many of the bank's peers for whom this was a wider issue. The issue had been identified in the COREP audit in 2017 and subsequently picked up by the PRA as part of the previous ICAAP submission. The management team was carrying out a separate piece of assurance work to remediate the issues and declare the quantum of the error in the next ICAAP submission. There had also been a number of minor issues. However, the commercial business was now largely correctly risk weighted. Although it would not completely mitigate against these issues, the move to AIRB would help to address this…”

211.

Two of the statements in that passage were plainly incorrect:

(1)

The use of incorrect risk weightings had not been “driven by a lack of clarity and conflicting rules in the regulatory publications”. It had been caused by the Bank’s staff failing to identify and apply the rules which applied to UK banks.

(2)

The commercial business was not “now largely correctly risk weighted” because, as Mr Arden agreed in cross-examination, the Bank had not yet “taken the risk-weightings through” into the CLIP numbers, and no adjustment had been made for them.