Table 1: NPD dolls classifications
Table 1: NPD dolls classifications
DOLLS | |||
SEGMENT | SUBSEGMENT | CLASS | SUBCLASS |
Nurturing dolls & accessories | Nurturing dolls & accessories | Nurturing dolls | Traditional nurturing dolls |
Special feature nurturing dolls | |||
Nurturing doll clothes | Nurturing doll clothes | ||
Nurturing doll carriages | Nurturing doll carriages | ||
Nurturing doll other accessories | Nurturing doll other accessories | ||
Fashion dolls/ accessories & role play | Fashion dolls & accessories | Fashion dolls | Fashion dolls |
Fashion doll clothes/ accessories | Fashion clothes | ||
Fashion accessories | |||
Fashion role play & dressup | Fashion role play & dressup | Fashion role play & dressup | |
Playset dolls & accessories | Playset dolls & accessories | Playset dolls & collectibles | Playset dolls & collectibles |
Playset doll accessories | Playset doll accessories | ||
Large dolls & accessories/ furniture | Large dolls & accessories/ furniture | Large dolls & accessories | Large dolls & accessories |
Doll houses/furniture | Doll houses/furniture | ||
During the relevant period, the UK market for playset dolls and collectibles was dominated by three specialist retailers: The Entertainer, Smyths and Toys R Us (TRU). General grocers such as Tesco and Sainsbury’s also sell toys including playset dolls, but toy sales only constitute under 1% of their revenue. The toy experts agreed that a successful launch of a new toy product requires support from at least several of the key toy retailers, and that take-up by grocers such as Tesco is generally dependent on initial successful sales in the specialist toy retailers.
During the period relevant to this dispute, toy sales were influenced by two particular trends. The first was the growing popularity of unboxing videos on platforms such as YouTube(and subsequently TikTok, which launched internationally in 2017). Unboxing videos consisted of child “influencers” unboxing various toys on camera. Many such influencers grew to become incredibly popular. The influencer of common interest to Cabo and MGA was a girl called Tiana Wilson (Tiana), who amassed some 16.5m subscribers on her YouTube channel. Both Cabo and MGA engaged Tiana to promote their products.
The second trend was a spike in the popularity of collectible toys. Although the collectibles market is an established toy market, there were several brands which enjoyed particular success in and around 2016–17, including in particular Shopkins (produced by Moose Toys) and Hatchimals Colleggtibles (produced by Spin Master).
- Heading
- INTRODUCTION
- THE EVIDENCE OF FACT
- MGA’s witnesses of fact
- Mr Larian’s breaches of purdah
- THE EXPERT EVIDENCE
- The economic and valuation experts: preliminary comments
- Assessment of the economic and valuation evidence
- The Decision Tree Model (DTM)
- ISSUES
- FACTUAL BACKGROUND
- The UK toy industry
- Table 1: NPD dolls classifications
- MGA and LOL Surprise
- Section 14
- The founding of Cabo and development of Worldeez
- Section 16
- The initial marketing of Worldeez
- Discussions with the launch retailers
- The Entertainer
- Toys R Us
- Smyths
- Other retailers
- MGA’s intervention
- Contacts with Cabo and Singleton
- The Entertainer
- Toys R Us
- Smyths
- B&M and other retailers
- AB Gee
- Worldeez repackaging and relaunch
- Launch of Worldeez globe in B&M
- Decline in B&M sales after August 2017
- Sales to other retailers
- Licensing and international distribution
- Nickelodeon advertising
- Demise of Cabo
- PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
- ABUSE OF DOMINANCE CLAIM
- The relevant market definition
- The parties’ submissions
- Mr Colley’s approach
- Mr Parker’s approach
- Section 44
- Conclusions on market definition
- Whether MGA was dominant on the relevant market
- The parties’ submissions
- Table 2: 2017 market shares for Colley and Parker markets (%)
- Table 3: Parker market share estimates for 2018–19 (%)
- Table 4: 2017 market shares for extended Colley market (%)
- Market shares
- Figure 1: Colley diagram of 2017 MGA and competitor market shares
- Competition from products outside the relevant market
- Barriers to entry and expansion
- Countervailing buyer power
- MGA’s conduct
- Conclusions on dominance
- Whether MGA’s conduct amounted to an abuse
- The parties’ submissions
- The overall exclusionary campaign
- MGA’s “response to commercial attack” argument
- MGA’s passing off defence
- Section 63
- Conclusion on abuse of dominance
- UNLAWFUL AGREEMENTS CLAIM
- Agreements with the toy traders
- Discussion and conclusions
- Anticompetitive object or effect
- Discussion and conclusions
- Exemption under the VBER
- Scope of the VBER
- Market share threshold
- Excluded restrictions
- Conclusion on the VBER
- Exemption under s. 9 / Article 101(3)
- Conclusion on the unlawful agreements claim
- PATENT THREATS CLAIM
- Threats of patent infringement proceedings
- The parties’ submissions
- Discussion
- “Person aggrieved”
- Conclusion on the patent threats claim
- CAUSATION AND QUANTUM
- Legal principles
- Quantification of the loss
- The approach to claims for lost profits
- Conclusions on the overarching approach
- Causative effect of MGA’s conduct
- Actionable damage and causation: Cabo’s heads of loss
- Whether Cabo would have traded profitably in the counterfactual case
- Product quality
- Section 92
- Marketing campaign
- Retailer support
- Business plan/financial projections
- Inventory management
- Working capital
- Toy expert evidence on commercial success
- Breakeven analysis
- Table 5: Volumes and working capital required to break even in 2017
- International sales
- Conclusions on whether Cabo would have traded profitably
- The parties’ quantum models
- Mr Colley’s quantum models
- Table 6: Cabo calculations of losses (£m)
- Assessment of Mr Colley’s models
- Mr Parker’s quantum models
- Table 7: MGA calculations of losses (£)
- Assessment of Mr Parker’s significant success model
- Table 8: Loss calculation for significant success model, comparing MGA and Cabo cost stacks (£)
- Assessment of Mr Parker’s moderate success model
- Figure 2: Parker moderate success model: average monthly revenue (£)
- Conclusions on the quantum models
- DECLARATORY RELIEF
- Conclusions
![HP-2020-000016 - [2025] EWHC 1451 (Ch)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_O3rEzCI.png)